Chiefs *****The Kingsley Suamataia Thread***** - Page 20

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
Zero chance I’d give Pacheco an extension.

Love the player, but he won’t last. Don’t love paying running backs anyway, but his style of play is even less conducive to longevity than other backs.

If you could flip out of him a year early for a mid round pick, I’d consider it. Or (preferably) just run him into the ground and let him walk. Then, maybe he comes back on a 1-year deal if no one pays him.

I'll say it again.

I would never, ever, give a running back a second contract.

I love Pacheco. He will be in the ring of honor. Not getting a second contract.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hoover:
I'll say it again.

I would never, ever, give a running back a second contract.

I love Pacheco. He will be in the ring of honor. Not getting a second contract.

If there’s a back who REALLY protects themselves and is used more as a receiver at times, then sure.

A pure running back, no way.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hoover:
I'll say it again.

I would never, ever, give a running back a second contract.

I love Pacheco. He will be in the ring of honor. Not getting a second contract.

Ring of honor is strong.....He's a good RB but lets not get carried away here.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by O.city:
Ring of honor is strong.....He's a good RB but lets not get carried away here.

Dante Hall is in the Ring of Honor…

I’ll take a starting RB in back to back Super Bowl seasons up there any day.
[Reply]

If anyone suggests we should save money by letting Butker walk, that person should be kicked in the nuts.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
If anyone suggests we should save money by letting Butker walk, that person should be kicked in the nuts.

I suffered through Carl trying to cheap out on the kicker position not resigning Lowery, I agree.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Warpaint69:
I suffered through Carl trying to cheap out on the kicker position not resigning Lowery, I agree.

I'd keep him before Bolton.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Warpaint69:
I suffered through Carl trying to cheap out on the kicker position not resigning Lowery, I agree.

When you look at the combination of power, accuracy, clutch, and titles, Butker is the best ever.

Pay him what it takes. The difference between him and the next guy won’t be substantial enough that it’s worth the savings.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
When you look at the combination of power, accuracy, clutch, and titles, Butker is the best ever.

Pay him what it takes. The difference between him and the next guy won’t be substantial enough that it’s worth the savings.

Yup, we have to keep him and if that means paying him as the highest paid kicker then fine, we don't win some of those playoff games or Superbowls without his clutch kicks. It's worth the money/cap space.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Warpaint69:
I suffered through Carl trying to cheap out on the kicker position not resigning Lowery, I agree.

Game manager issue.

Lin Elliot has 2 super bowl rings.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Game manager issue.

Lin Elliot has 2 super bowl rings.

And the JAGS on the PS have SB rings. Carl Peterson is 99% the reason that 95 team didn't win a SB.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
If anyone suggests we should save money by letting Butker walk, that person should be kicked in the nuts.

By Mr. Butker himself!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by PHOG:
By Mr. Butker himself!

With the force of a 60 yard field goal into a strong wind!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
If anyone suggests we should save money by letting Butker walk, that person should be kicked in the nuts.

Repeatedly. Until there's no longer a chance of them procreating.
[Reply]