Originally Posted by dj56dt58:
Yeah just pay the 30k a month your child needs to live
I think the court systems are more fair then they were in the past. IF mom works and makes similar money as the father then child support is not needed. Custody should be split weekly as well.
From what I've seen recently the days of mother getting everything is in the past. At least from what I witnessed a few friends going through a divorce with kids.
I believe the best rule is to set all your emotions aside during this process. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eureka:
I think the court systems are more fair then they were in the past. IF mom works and makes similar money as the father then child support is not needed. Custody should be split weekly as well.
From what I've seen recently the days of mother getting everything is in the past. At least from what I witnessed a few friends going through a divorce with kids.
I believe the best rule is to set all your emotions aside during this process.
Hope your right. I think it’s ridiculous when someone has to pay like 10k a month in child support just because they have a lot of money. We know it’s mom spending that shit [Reply]
Originally Posted by dj56dt58:
Hope your right. I think it’s ridiculous when someone has to pay like 10k a month in child support just because they have a lot of money. We know it’s mom spending that shit
Originally Posted by dj56dt58:
Hope your right. I think it’s ridiculous when someone has to pay like 10k a month in child support just because they have a lot of money. We know it’s mom spending that shit
I assure you that this deadbeat won't be paying $10K/month. If he had an income that warranted $10K/month, he would already have a lawyer to help with other fiscal legal issues and wouldn't be on here asking about a lawyer. He's in OP, and in KS child support is calculated at roughly 16% of gross income so he would be making ~$750K/year. Anyone making $750K/year and bitching about child support in the $10K/month range shouldn't be a father in the first place. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eureka:
I think the court systems are more fair then they were in the past. IF mom works and makes similar money as the father then child support is not needed. Custody should be split weekly as well.
From what I've seen recently the days of mother getting everything is in the past. At least from what I witnessed a few friends going through a divorce with kids.
I believe the best rule is to set all your emotions aside during this process.
My divorce was around 27 years ago and it was in the State of Calif. At the time there was a formula. How much each parent earned and how much time was spent with the child. They then calculated child support off those parameters. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eureka:
I think the court systems are more fair then they were in the past. IF mom works and makes similar money as the father then child support is not needed. Custody should be split weekly as well.
From what I've seen recently the days of mother getting everything is in the past. At least from what I witnessed a few friends going through a divorce with kids.
I believe the best rule is to set all your emotions aside during this process.
Do you have kids? This reads like you don't.
Why should either parent with primary custody (mother or father) bear all the costs of raising the child just because they're equivalent in earnings to their former spouse?
Raising kids is EFFING EXPENSIVE. If you're a single parent who works, kids are in daycare until they're in school and then you have after care and all the other endless streams of things that cost major bucks (health insurance, activities, clothes, food).
Equal custody is also something that just doesn't make a lot of sense for the CHILDREN. Living in a different house full-time each week is detrimental to daily schedules (including sleep schedules) and it could interrupt school attendance. [Reply]
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
Do you have kids? This reads like you don't.
Why should either parent with primary custody (mother or father) bear all the costs of raising the child just because they're equivalent in earnings to their former spouse?
Raising kids is EFFING EXPENSIVE. If you're a single parent who works, kids are in daycare until they're in school and then you have after care and all the other endless streams of things that cost major bucks (health insurance, activities, clothes, food).
Equal custody is also something that just doesn't make a lot of sense for the CHILDREN. Living in a different house full-time each week is detrimental to daily schedules (including sleep schedules) and it could interrupt school attendance.
I just had my first child. I waited til I was older and married Unlike some of my friends that I mentioned.
I was just referencing some of my friends and what happened in their divorces. If parents are making the same amount of money and sharing custody then why should child support be given to either one? I agree if one parent is making lots more money then child support shouldn't be given or there is a primary parent. You make some good points.
My Friends kids who split weeks seem to be well adjusted teenagers. Maybe, it's not for every family situation. I'm sure there are all type of different scenarios that happen when it comes to divorce court and child support. Again I was just referencing what I knew of some of my friends divorces. [Reply]
SPchief 09-28-2020, 07:34 PM
This message has been deleted by SPchief.
Reason: Wrong thread