Originally Posted by KCChiefsbundle of sticks88:
And those Chiefs teams during the early years with Andy as HC weren’t exactly overflowing with talent… especially on offense.
Andy managed to score 44 points in that Indy playoff game with an offense that included the likes of Alex Smiff, Donnie Avery, Anthony Fasano, etc.
Their best offensive player by far… Jamaal Charles… was lost to injury on the first offensive series of the game.
And yet...couldn't wind 2 quarters of clock up 28 points, before Indy could come back all while losing time of possession, turnover battle, and running 15 less plays.
Top shelf pant shitting.
Meanwhile Bill Walsh gets curb stomped 49-3 in a playoff game with Joe Montana and Jerry Rice and Wallcrawler gives him a total pass.
Sure. Let's compare eras the game were played, and pretend they are in any way remotely similar.
Name any team in history. Star studded stacked rosters. All of them have been outplayed at some point by another team, with the exception of the 72 Dolphins.
You act as if that vicious Giants defense was some group of powder puffs incapable of doing anything to destroy an offense. But then you've attempted to discredit Joe Gibbs in your Andy fanboy crusade as well, so we're way past reeruned with you by this point.
You've lost your fingertip grip on reality and plunged into an abyss of irreversible lunacy.
As an aside, and I'm not sure why I even thought someone as utterly daft as you would actually pay attention to detail, but at the time my list you've been fapping over was posted, Andy was still behind Walsh at just 2 superbowl wins.
So at the time of the post, (oh, context, the ruiner of reeruns) Walsh had 3 rings and designed an entire offensive philosophy.
Oh but he got piss pounded by Parcells and Lawrence Taylor that one time, which is far worse than blowing multiple multi score leads in just 2 quarters. Lmao.
How is that more humiliating than blowing multiple games well in hand?
How is that more humiliating than being unable to beat at team in your house who couldn't cross the goal line when your entire coaching profile is one of an offensive minded coach, with Kelce, Hunt, and Hill on your offense?
You can continue to fanboy all you like.
I firmly believe that without Mahomes, Andy has 0 titles.
He's got the best qb in the universe, arguable best tight end ever, and he still had to literally claw and fight tooth and nail to get those victories, with superhuman efforts by 15 to win 2 of them, and a defense that entered God mode in tandem with Superman for the third.
You ever wonder why the Chiefs just don't blow the doors off anyone in these big games? Why they always go down multiple scores?
How even in regular season, the shittiest tram in the league still has a shot to win the game because KC plays down to their opponent?
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
The Chiefs won a playoff game 26-7, dude. :-)
Doesn't count.
"Oh, you find that win impressive? Against the paper tiger, fair weather Dolphins and Tua who has scrambled eggs for brains and no arm? Thats what impresses you?"
Y'know, if you don't really care about Super Bowl wins but prefer knocking the breaks off of regular season opponents, we could always hire Sean McDermott after Andy retires. He's pretty good at it, you'd love his 9/11 speeches too. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz:
He's pretty good at it, you'd love his 9/11 speeches too.
Listen **** stick.
You want to debate football philosophy differences, hey great. You want to make derogatory remarks about my intelligence for having the view that I do, have at it.
But don't ****ing imply that I would ever agree with anyone having anything good to say about 9/11, you slimy little one who sucks the penis.
Like, what the **** is your problem here? Would you care to elaborate on what I posted that would give you the idea that I would enjoy anyone speaking fondly of such an atrocity?
Die in a fire. Screaming. Preferably within view of cctv cams. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler:
Listen **** stick.
You want to debate football philosophy differences, hey great. You want to make derogatory remarks about my intelligence for having the view that I do, have at it.
But don't ****ing imply that I would ever agree with anyone having anything good to say about 9/11, you slimy little one who sucks the penis.
Like, what the **** is your problem here? Would you care to elaborate on what I posted that would give you the idea that I would enjoy anyone speaking fondly of such an atrocity?
Die in a fire. Screaming. Preferably within view of cctv cams.
So, you been here a good little while now. What would you say you enjoy most about Chiefsplanet?... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
The Chiefs have literally been competitive EVERY SINGLE WEEK under Reid and that includes under Alex Smith. Didn't matter who we played we had a chance down to the final minute. Over a decade straight under Reid of basically NEVER being blown out is impressive
Blowing a lead hurts more, but getting dominated start to finish is at least as bad from a coaching perspective. I'm pretty sure every head coach in the league would agree with this. [Reply]
If Failcrawler had been a niners fan in the 80s there would have been non-stop bitching in 85, 86 and 87.
"Now that Montana is hurt Walsh's genius seems to result in nothing but postseason failure. We should stick with Young but unless Parcells leaves NY we are fucked. Bill is wasting Jerry Rice's career." [Reply]
