- Ranked 2nd among charted prospects in success rate vs. man (75%) and press coverage (75.7%) - Led all prospects in success rate vs. zone coverage (88.1%) - He can play inside and outsidehttps://t.co/HbifB61JlJpic.twitter.com/HYsV8rlAzF
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Man you guys really have just got to take some breaths my bros
I just got home from Phx and watching all the Chiefs content and videos I can get my hands on. This was very interesting to see how it went down and who lined up wrong. Trying to understand what went right or wrong on the play. Hence ---- a question :-)
lol
So, you admit to watching the clip in question, yes? And you saw Toney point Mahomes over to Moores side of the formation, correct? And you expect us to believe you came out of that with the belief Moore stole it from Toney? No, nobody here is ACTUALLY that slack jaw. You're just trolling, poorly, again. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
So, you admit to watching the clip in question, yes? And you saw Toney point Mahomes over to Moores side of the formation, correct? And you expect us to believe you came out of that with the belief Moore stole it from Toney? No, nobody here is ACTUALLY that slack jaw. You're just trolling, poorly, again.
I legitimately was trying to determine how they lined up wrong. I've watched sooo many Chiefs vids today. It's been great.
Nothing but zen here. Just the slightest bit perturbed that your shitposting is still so lackluster in quality despite you doing it all the fucking time. CP deserves better trolling than that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
But at the same time, a guy having a 62 yard game or making a block can't be "See, I told you he'd break out!!!"
I mean if you're gonna try to claim you put one through the uprights, shouldn't you have to plant them SOMEHOW?
I do agree there are ways Moore can make himself valuable (if not 2nd round pick valuable) without having the kind of statistical impact many would like to see. But if someone's that bullish on him, shouldn't there be some sort of established baseline to prevent someone from throwing a dart and then drawing the bullseye around it?
Because that's exactly what our boy Pitt just did. "See, you haters were too eager!!! Silly Chief Fan!" When...uh...turns out he didn't even line up correctly.
If people can't hold their fire, then shouldn't they at least go on the record?
Where are people getting this nonsense? You've claimed more than once that Moore didn't line up correctly. Where did you want him to be? [Reply]
From the various mic'd ups - it sounds like it was always Skyy's play.
Also according to Reid, Corn Dog is a run play with a pass option. Skyy's play was pure pass. Skyy's play wasn't Corn Dog. But that will get lost to history. It's way too easy to call them both Corn Dog. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
If we roll with Toney, Moore, Watson next year and don't retain MVS or JuJu...
1. Is this a possibility?
2. What do you think their statlines would be like?
Assuming we draft a WR in first three rounds but will be an interesting offszn
I gotta think we won’t cut MVS unless it’s to keep JuJu. I have a hard time seeing us part ways with both of two leading wide receivers, especially when one of them is on a really reasonable deal. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
If we roll with Toney, Moore, Watson next year and don't retain MVS or JuJu...
1. Is this a possibility?
2. What do you think their statlines would be like?
Assuming we draft a WR in first three rounds but will be an interesting offszn
The stat lines are unpredictable at this point. You'd really have to know how many TDs Moore was going to try to steal before you could make a guess. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Red Dawg:
MVS is under contract for 23 and 24. Watson is an FA. MVS, Toney and Moore are what we have under contract that played.
I assume they will Resign Watson for cheap. Alot of ppl think the plan was to never have MVS for year two but O wouldn't be upset if he came back. Just not very consistent [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chief Pagan:
So if it's been mentioned, I missed it.
If Kelce had lined up correctly, what was the play call?
Toney was going to run the exact same corn dog route from the same side of the field he had done before?
I think what happened was kelce was lined up in the wrong spot, and Pat saw where he was, and his memory played a trick on him. He knew that he was supposed to motion to Kelce's side, so when he saw Travis on his right, he assumed that the motion was from the right. But the play was always for Skyy to go in motion. If Travis had been lined up on the left, Pat would've motioned Skyy. [Reply]
