Originally Posted by dlphg9:
Lmao and the play that Clark makes the tackle for loss hes being blocked by a WR. So at least now Clark can be a "dog" when WR, TE, or some of the absolute worst tackles in the league are blocking him, because at the beginning of the season he couldnt even do that. The way to stop Clark is put a lineman on him that is below avg or better and he is easily blocked. What a big badass. Man he sure showed everyone what real football is. He needs to stop running his ****ing mouth and let his play do the talking.
Always some sort of excuse as to why he does good .... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
i'd say merely forcing the Raiders to run to one side of the field predominantly IS making a difference
no, no no...if Clark played 25 snaps then 20 of those should be sacks or tackles for a loss....the other 5 must be forced interceptions or actual strips of the QB [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
no, no no...if Clark played 25 snaps then 20 of those should be sacks or tackles for a loss....the other 5 must be forced interceptions or actual strips of the QB
Originally Posted by petegz28:
no, no no...if Clark played 25 snaps then 20 of those should be sacks or tackles for a loss....the other 5 must be forced interceptions or actual strips of the QB
There we go with the "he has to make a big play every single play or he sucks" bullshit. He had 1 tackle and that was when he was going against a WR. Other than him wrecking a wideout he was worthless. I also find it very hard to believe that he wasn't flipping from side to side. Im gonna have to rewatch [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
So now Clark's only other plays suck? Yeah, I think they know who he is as they saw him stuffing a run play 6 yards in the backfield.
Like I said, you think every play has to be some highlight reel play which just shows how idiotic you are being.
They billed him as a defensive player of the year type player. Are we allowed to hold him to that standard or not? [Reply]
Originally Posted by dlphg9:
There we go with the "he has to make a big play every single play or he sucks" bullshit. He had 1 tackle and that was when he was going against a WR. Other than him wrecking a wideout he was worthless. I also find it very hard to believe that he wasn't flipping from side to side. Im gonna have to rewatch
There we go with the he only did this and it was only because of that....
Originally Posted by petegz28:
You can hold him to whatever standard you want. Just don't get pissed when people tell you that you're takes are a bit unreasonable.
I'm not pissed. I'm embarrassed that the bar is set so low for a guy that was billed so highly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
There we go with the he only did this and it was only because of that....
See how this works
Well the difference between what I say and what you say is that what im saying is actually true. What you say is complete false and no one has ever said it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
You can hold him to whatever standard you want. Just don't get pissed when people tell you that you're takes are a bit unreasonable.
How is that unreasonable? You say a lot without actually saying anything. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
You can hold him to whatever standard you want. Just don't get pissed when people tell you that you're takes are a bit unreasonable.
What standard do you hold a player that we traded a 1st and 2nd round pick go and gave 105 million to? [Reply]