This is the foundation of my hate, hands down. The only difference is, what YOU call "slow learning", I call "REFUSAL to learn".
[QUOTE=RunKC;14628722]Clark has been hurt most of this season unfortunately, but no he or any player was ever going to be worth that deal and that’s why you should be pissed from the moment it was made. It was a no win situation.
Both him and Chris Jones have not met expectations this year[/0]
^^^^ Pitiful deflection to Jones. Pure shite.
Originally Posted by lewdog:
Dude, you’re one of the biggest homers now. Nothing is wrong ever (which isn’t true).
You’re becoming BossChief 2.0. It’s sickening.
Like fucking hell he is; BC is far more objective. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Clark played 33 snaps last night.
The Raiders ran the ball on 20 of them, and most of them away from him.
You just can't judge anything off this game at all.
Quit the ****ing knee jerking.
I think you could make Matt Cassel seem like he played well...
Let's see - "Out of 20 pass plays, Matt only had 5 real opportunities to throw the ball b/c the WR's were covered 10 times and 5 times the OL was aids.
Originally Posted by TEX:
I think you could make Matt Cassel seem like he played well...
Let's see - "Out of 20 pass plays, Matt only had 5 real opportunities to throw the ball b/c the WR's were covered 10 times and 5 times the OL was aids.
Just messing with ya, but dang, it sure seems like you go out of your way to defend Clark.
This is not 'going out of my way.'
Anyone with half a brain can see:
1. The majority of snaps were running plays away from him because the Raiders would rather not run to his side.
2. When they did, other than one run, it was hugely ineffective.
3. He barely had any real pass rush opportunities. He lost a couple of those snaps, affected the play on a couple of others that wound up a sack and an INT, and that's it.
There's nothing to bitch about here, other than the fact that he may, indeed, be a brokedick if he can't go this week.
If he comes out and buries Brady in the turf of Gilette this week no one will give a fuck about a handful of snaps against the Raiders where he had limited opportunity.
Wow - crediting Clark w/ the sack, eh? Because he was on the field when Jones won his rep, I guess.
Like I said - Clay just playing the hits on the Frank Clark excuses track. "He's just doing his job" and "He's hurt..."
Always an excuse for the guy.
And remember - the criticism of Clark isn't an indictment of Clark, it's an indictment of Veach. And when the guy can't make it through a game...again...that's absolutely a problem. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
And remember - the criticism of Clark isn't an indictment of Clark, it's an indictment of Veach. And when the guy can't make it through a game...again...that's absolutely a problem.
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
This is not 'going out of my way.'
Anyone with half a brain can see:
1. The majority of snaps were running plays away from him because the Raiders would rather not run to his side.
2. When they did, other than one run, it was hugely ineffective.
3. He barely had any real pass rush opportunities. He lost a couple of those snaps, affected the play on a couple of others that wound up a sack and an INT, and that's it.
There's nothing to bitch about here, other than the fact that he may, indeed, be a brokedick if he can't go this week.
If he comes out and buries Brady in the turf of Gilette this week no one will give a **** about a handful of snaps against the Raiders where he had limited opportunity.
Which is exactly what happened.
Correct, Nobody will care. Also correct if he can't go, he's a brokedick. I think he's that now. [Reply]
Frank Clark missed 2 games in 4 years in Seattle. He played through some shit there and got 10, 9 and 13 sacks in the 3 years that he became a starter.
He was on the field and available to his team over 95% of the time.
It sucks that he has had injury concerns this year but I don’t see how that is Veach’s fault. Shit happens in this game to players eventually. I get the compensation argument bc I agree with it, but this dude was not a brokedick in Seattle.
You guys are acting like this guy is Dee Ford, who has had very bad injury concerns dating back to college. [Reply]
Come on Clay, youre the king of Gifs and you have the perfect opportunity to prove us wrong and GIF up all the running plays he was on the field, but you didn't. I think that's bbecause you're making shit up. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dlphg9:
Come on Clay, youre the king of Gifs and you have the perfect opportunity to prove us wrong and GIF up all the running plays he was on the field, but you didn't. I think that's bbecause you're making shit up.
go watch the video yourself
frank NEVER lined up on the offensive right side
not ONCE
he played RDE the whole game and the Raiders almost exclusively ran middle or right, away from him, while he was in the game
i mean, it's been that way almost the whole year, but go ahead and think something changed to fit this bullshit narrative [Reply]
