This is a long ass article and definitely worth your time.
7.14.19 update:
Without further delay - we present some additional research. This article isn't about suspensions. This is now 100% about daylighting wrongs and helping someone caught in a tangled web of manipulation and pain. https://t.co/bQNC8Cyju4
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 14, 2019
This morning at 6am PST, we received images labeled States Evidence & Court Transcripts from Tyreek's March 9, 2015 Probable Cause hearing. You can read about how Tyreek asked Crystal to leave his place on 12/11/14 before stuff went down & more .... https://t.co/jz0Hqj052i
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 16, 2019
In addition to asking for a paternity test, Espinal is seeking sole legal custody of the twins and asks that Tyreek Hill "pay appropriate child support." She also asks that Hill have "supervised parenting time" with the children.
I don’t want the kids to suffer in any way, but it would be nice if the child support is based on Tyreek”s current earnings. He can still give them as much money as he wants outside of the child support. [Reply]
My source: “Crystal is off her rocker. State of KS reportedly wants to limit her custody and she took it to court. This is good news for Hill. If he fights, he can introduce his recorded statement about 2014 incident to publicly clear his name, just not legally.”
— The Chiefs Kingdom (Ver 2.0) (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 12, 2019
If this were true she would be the defendant in the case. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The mother of Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver Tyreek Hill’s children, Crystal Espinal, has filed a petition in Johnson County District Court for custody and child support of twins born earlier this month.
Espinal filed a petition to determine paternity, custody, residency, parenting time and child support Thursday.
In court documents, Espinal asks for custody of the twins, because she and Hill “are not married, never have been married, and do not intend to be married.”
She requests that the court determine Hill’s paternity and give her “sole legal custody and residency of the minor children,” according to court documents.
It further asks the court to set a schedule for “supervised parenting time” and force Hill to “pay appropriate child support.”
A separate court filing asks for a motion to seal the case “due to the public personas and the notoriety and publicity that has been engendered by the parties’ actions, which resulted in a previous case being sealed for the protection of the parents’ older child.”
Seems like a good deal for both sides. They can probably negotiate that supervised time to be unsupervised but other than that, this looks like a decent compromise. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chief Northman:
She wants the case sealed because she knows she is going to lose, and “truths” about her are going to come out....
Uh... Would you want the world to know about court cases involving your kids? Positively or negatively? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
So I’m happy to say Hills lawyer have more than enough evidence that relates to the custody of children that will make this hell for her.
