Just a few days ago we were praising Veach and now some are ready to panic because we didn't throw money away. Right now we have about $22M and we'll need about $7-7.5M to sign our draft picks. Most of us would like to see Mathieu extended and that will take some cash. I'll trust Veach. [Reply]
Originally Posted by oldman:
Just a few days ago we were praising Veach and now some are ready to panic because we didn't throw money away. Right now we have about $22M and we'll need about $7-7.5M to sign our draft picks. Most of us would like to see Mathieu extended and that will take some cash. I'll trust Veach.
A mathieu extension would give us even more cap space... [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15:
Understandably PFF has a lot of detractors. They are pretty hit and miss.
They’re really not that bad of a reference for some stuff, but a lot of their draft stuff is based on their grading system and I just don’t think it’s applicable when evaluating college prospects. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
They’re really not that bad of a reference for some stuff, but a lot of their draft stuff is based on their grading system and I just don’t think it’s applicable when evaluating college prospects.
That's fair. I like to look at their stuff just for a general feel. The draft is tough to grade to begin with. There's so many players who don't pan out from top to bottom. Every expert looks silly at some point. [Reply]
I'd be OK with Villanueva since he doesn't have the usual 32 year old T injury problems. Does anyone know what kind of money we'd have to give for him? [Reply]
Originally Posted by oldman:
I'd be OK with Villanueva since he doesn't have the usual 32 year old T injury problems. Does anyone know what kind of money we'd have to give for him?
