Originally Posted by O.city:
He took the most money offered. It's what they mostly always do, as we all would.
True but if you are taking a one year deal at his position and age you better make sure it is a good fit. Cuz hes gonna need that 3 year deal.
Hardmans skillset is fits perfectly for the gadget role that the Chiefs utilize. Some teams dont have much of a gadget role. Basically he was as successful as he could ever be wirh the Chiefs. One thing we know for certain is hes no more than a WR3. If he was drafted by another team and they tried to make him be a WR and no gadget stuff/sweeps etc he might have even been almost out of the league
As Ive always maintained after we drafted him, hes a fast guy who plays football not a football player who is fast. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Well, it's a pretty considerable difference between Midwest cost of living and New York. But Hardman doesn't appear to be wise.
You are talking what may be just 9mos. of living expenses in New Jersey. It's really not even a factor and kind of silly to hang your hat onto.
It's not like he is setting down roots, buying a house, etc in New Jersey. I'm sure the increase of living expenses, even if it is a couple hundred thousand is minimal if the contract was substantially more than the Chiefs offered. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Abba-Dabba:
You are talking what may be just 9mos. of living expenses in New Jersey. It's really not even a factor and kind of silly to hang your hat onto.
It's not like he is setting down roots, buying a house, etc in New Jersey. I'm sure the increase of living expenses, even if it is a couple hundred thousand is minimal if the contract was substantially more than the Chiefs offered.
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Well, it's a pretty considerable difference between Midwest cost of living and New York. But Hardman doesn't appear to be wise.
Does that matter for a professional football player, unless he's literally blown all his previous money? [Reply]