Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
what did Little measure in at?
I can’t find a number but his scouting reports rave about his length (giggity) and some tweets I’ve seen indicate he’s one of the guys who pass the length threshold average of 34 [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
I can’t find a number but his scouting reports rave about his length (giggity) and some tweets I’ve seen indicate he’s one of the guys who pass the length threshold average of 34
A trade back out of the first or a trade up in the second for Little then. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
what did Little measure in at?
Have yet to see a report with it. I've been looking. That said, Little had some pretty serious pass blocking issues that you'd have hoped to see him work out over time but injury and covid... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Here's why I think Little may well be the guy we take, and most likely at #63.
1)It's literally a repeat of the Niang pick. First round value talent, drops due to an injury.
2)He fits the physical measurables; all the traits Reid looks for. His pass blocking is his strength too.
3)Dummies don't go to Stanford. This is a smart kid. He's going to have the mental wherewithal to handle whatever they want him to teach him.
I really disagree on pass blocking being his strength and I can say confidently I'm very much not alone there. Agility issues, specifically opening and aligning his hips, and letting guys into his chest were huge problems. I think he has the ability to learn and get better there, but there's a difference between that and it being a strength. [Reply]