Brown wants a Tunsil contract which would put him in the same range as what people think Williams will get.

He's not worth that kind of scratch, especially when you'd have to pay with picks too.
[Reply]

Easy peasy lemon squeezy
[Reply]

I didn't think they would cut both but I knew at least one would be gone. That's why I thought all the posts talking about how they'd both be starting by mid season weird.


Oh well. They both had good runs here. Big parts of us winning a superbowl. Thanks guys!
[Reply]

Great.. let’s trade for a dead guy.. maybe someone will trip over him..
[Reply]

I'm with OK here.

Either big money or picks but not both.
[Reply]

Proven stud, firmly in his prime years? Extend that deal and in 3 years, it's a bargain and he's STILL in his prime.

I don't know that it's what we WILL do, but it's certainly not a bad idea.
[Reply]

would've been more effective than the SB.
[Reply]

Wow, didn't expect this.
[Reply]

Except he's not a proven stud. He's just a step below that but wants to be paid like one.

In fact, isn't he kind of plodding to play LT in this scheme?
[Reply]

:-)
[Reply]

My guess is Niang will be substantially better than Remmers at RT. Of course, we don't know what we are getting with Niang, but Remmers is a Guard. No way I put him back out there at T. Niang has a good track record and seems to move well for his size, so pretty sure he is part of the mix.
[Reply]

Id be all for it. We are still in the ballpark of what though $3 million over the cap? Williams likely demands a contract in the ballpark of $18-$20 million per. Still a tall task even after these cuts I would think?
[Reply]

He wants to be a lady.
[Reply]

Who knew that we had both Geoff and Mitch on the roster! At least we didn't cut Mitch, right?
[Reply]

And their injuries were a big part of losing a Super Bowl. I'm as shocked as everybody else about both being gone but I think everyone is finding out BV isn't sentimental when it comes to winning and losing Super Bowls.
[Reply]