Biggest annoyance about Endgame is we didn't see her and Banner in the Soul World. Perfect opportunity to wrap up Whedon's weird romance plot in a moving way and they missed it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chiefspants:
Biggest annoyance about Endgame is we didn't see her and Banner in the Soul World. Perfect opportunity to wrap up Whedon's weird romance plot in a moving way and they missed it.
That whole romance subplot was one of the weirder things in the MCU.
I did too! We went and saw this last friday at the movie theatre. First movie experience since all this started. The after credit ending had me confused however.. especially since the movie was supposed to take place before end game and all that. So, was that in the future after end game? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990:
That whole romance subplot was one of the weirder things in the MCU.
glad it got dropped.
I'd have preferred it got dropped before Phase 3. It was enough of a part of Thor 3 and Infinity War it felt weird to drop it completely from Endgame but whatevs. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chiefspants:
I'd have preferred it got dropped before Phase 3. It was enough of a part of Thor 3 and Infinity War it felt weird to drop it completely from Endgame but whatevs.
Yeah I feel like Barton and Nat were better but love story wasn't necessary [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chiefspants:
Biggest annoyance about Endgame is we didn't see her and Banner in the Soul World. Perfect opportunity to wrap up Whedon's weird romance plot in a moving way and they missed it.
Nice! Your right - did not think of that angle. [Reply]
It was good, maybe even very good. It felt a little mechanical, but the car-plane chase at the start and the Taskmaster choreography were jaw-dropping. [Reply]
Originally Posted by eDave:
Emma Stone is reportedly considering suing Disney over Cruella's hybrid release, after Scarlett Johansson filed her lawsuit.
And Emily Blunt's name is being mentioned as a talent that could speak out after Jungle Cruise opens this weekend.
All jumping on the bandwagon.
Funny thing is, they were probably all in favor of COVID changes. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Carr4MVP:
All jumping on the bandwagon.
Funny thing is, they were probably all in favor of COVID changes.
Not sure what anyone being in favor of COVID changes has to do with it? I assume you are referring to things like masks or social distancing?
I'll be curious to here what kind of negotiations took place prior to release. It was rumored they originally pushed it a year because of the contract issues with ScarJo. I'm kind of surprised they just didn't negotiate royalties from the Disney+ sales. [Reply]
Originally Posted by unlurking:
Not sure what anyone being in favor of COVID changes has to do with it? I assume you are referring to things like masks or social distancing?
I'll be curious to here what kind of negotiations took place prior to release. It was rumored they originally pushed it a year because of the contract issues with ScarJo. I'm kind of surprised they just didn't negotiate royalties from the Disney+ sales.
I think he's talking in the broad sense that it's oddly reliable how often 'we all need to sacrifice' subtly and quietly turns into 'you need to sacrifice and I need to get my lawyer to make you pay for costing me potential wealth.' [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
I think he's talking in the broad sense that it's oddly reliable how often 'we all need to sacrifice' subtly and quietly turns into 'you need to sacrifice and I need to get my lawyer to make you pay for costing me potential wealth.'
You nailed it.
I suppose it makes me laugh because the same people calling for and shaming people for not wanting to shut down are getting burned by the same policies they advocated for. And now we are supposed to sorry for them.
If she has a legitimate case, I hope she received just compensation. It doesn't change the fact that she probably got burned by the very thing she wanted. Shutdowns are all good until it cost me money. [Reply]
I suppose it makes me laugh because the same people calling for and shaming people for not wanting to shut down are getting burned by the same policies they advocated for. And now we are supposed to sorry for them.
If she has a legitimate case, I hope she received just compensation. It doesn't change the fact that she probably got burned by the very thing she wanted. Shutdowns are all good until it cost me money.
But Disney can? While breaching contract in the process? Contracts are to be honored. Or why even have them. [Reply]
This spoiler about this movie also contains a spoiler about Falcon/Winter Soldier.
Spoiler!
So we can all assume that Julia Louis-Dreyfus' character is building some kind of super team of her own? She's recruited Nat's sister in this movie and the failed Cap in F/WS.