:-)
[Reply]

I usually turn it off when both of them are on there at the same time. Too much negativity.

Topics like- What is the WORST case scenario for the Chiefs this year.

Petro says stuff like- "They did NOTHING to improve the defense, so I can see them missing the playoffs this year."

Teicher- "Yes, I agree."

:-):-):-):-)
[Reply]

I’m fine with realistic negativity, but their negativity isn’t even realistic.

Teicher said that the Chiefs deserve a B or B- for the draft IF you include Orlando Brown. Umm...adding a top 5 LT is an A all fucking day.

His only critique was Kaindoh...but apparently that drops us an entire letter grade.
[Reply]

Maybe? I mean, it’s not unusual. Think Montana, Manning, Brady, Favre...
[Reply]

It could absolutely happen, but that’s not my point.

We’re going into year 4 and he just signed a 10 year contract extension. Why is this even a topic on local radio right now?

There are plenty of other worthy topics to discuss.
[Reply]

Gotcha.

That’s the problem with talk radio and the 24/7 news cycle. They have too much airtime to fill.
[Reply]

The point is that Mahomes is about to play his 5th NFL season, not his 15th.

Why even fucking ask that question? Or talk about it?

It's like asking, "Do you think Andy Reid will die before he hits 80 years old?"
[Reply]

His role is to literally play contrarian, that's all Petro does. The Chiefs like 610 more than 810 so 810 likes to take the piss out of them.
[Reply]

I don't mind people playing contrarian, but play contrarian with something that's reasonable and not obviously false.

Saying things such as the Chiefs haven't tried to improve the defense is borderline idiotic. They added a premium pass rushing DT who had double-digit sacks the last time he played on a DL with some talent, and spent their top draft pick on a LB who will be an upgrade from Damien Wilson Day 1 and let them play in less predictable nickel and dime sets.

Now, if you want to say they haven't done enough in the SECONDARY, OK. We can chat. There are counterpoints (FA not over; large inventory of players; etc.)
[Reply]

I don’t even think the secondary is an issue. Guys like Sneed, Thornhill, and Fenton will only get better. Bring Breeland back, as we’ve got everyone we had last year who mattered.

Besides, we allowed the 10th lowest passer rating last year despite registering the 14th fewest sacks in the league. Get a bit more pass rush with Reed and a second year of Wharton/Danna (maybe a consistent Clark???), and you’ll see the secondary look even better.
[Reply]

Oh, I agree.

But you could take at least an arguable contrarian point by saying the secondary lost a key piece and likely won't play that well again, that they didn' reinforce the position.

Saying they didn't do anything to improve the defense is stupid.
[Reply]

I wonder if the plan is to play Wharton inside and outside after adding Reed.

He’s 6’4” and was listed at 256 but played at a higher weight.
[Reply]