This is a long ass article and definitely worth your time.
7.14.19 update:
Without further delay - we present some additional research. This article isn't about suspensions. This is now 100% about daylighting wrongs and helping someone caught in a tangled web of manipulation and pain. https://t.co/bQNC8Cyju4
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 14, 2019
This morning at 6am PST, we received images labeled States Evidence & Court Transcripts from Tyreek's March 9, 2015 Probable Cause hearing. You can read about how Tyreek asked Crystal to leave his place on 12/11/14 before stuff went down & more .... https://t.co/jz0Hqj052i
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 16, 2019
Originally Posted by Kiimosabi:
If that's true KCTV5 is going to get burned to the ground.
Why would they only excerpt parts that were damaging to Hill? I get the whole SJW infestation thing, but why would they think they could get away with it? What a clown show the media is in this country. Fake News indeed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Halfcan:
Yes, I know the source is unreliable- but he is not posting this as a guess. He flat out says Reek waived his rights. No gray area there to backtrack on. A pretty BOLD statement to just pull out of his ass.
Do you have evidence Reek did not do this or tried to hide anything to investigators? Please link up- if so.
What? The burden of proof is on him. He's the one making a positive statement. And yes he is known for pulling shit out of his ass. That's his whole reputation. [Reply]
Originally Posted by FringeNC:
Why would they only excerpt parts that were damaging to Hill? I get the whole SJW infestation thing, but why would they think they could get away with it? What a clown show the media is in this country. Fake News indeed.
In case you missed it shaping the narrative is far more important than any facts these days. [Reply]
Originally Posted by FringeNC:
Why would they only excerpt parts that were damaging to Hill? I get the whole SJW infestation thing, but why would they think they could get away with it? What a clown show the media is in this country. Fake News indeed.
And people wanna shit on Trump when he tells the truth [Reply]
Originally Posted by Halfcan:
Yes, I know the source is unreliable- but he is not posting this as a guess. He flat out says Reek waived his rights. No gray area there to backtrack on. A pretty BOLD statement to just pull out of his ass.
Do you have evidence Reek did not do this or tried to hide anything to investigators? Please link up- if so.
Am i missing something? If he waived his rights, it means he did not plead the 5th and told them whatever they asked? Correct? [Reply]
Originally Posted by TravelingChiefs:
Plus Rosen was all over Twitter defending the Star and Pryor. He's just as responsible.
Don't forget the KCTV5 guy bradding all over twitter about being first to break the news and smugly celebrating. He deleted the tweet or I'd show you.
Even if Hill was guilty that's a bad fucking look. It was incredibly clear he didn't give a rat's ass about Zev or Crystal, just the story. Despicable. [Reply]
So a four game max suspension is the popular opinion at this point, negotiated down to 2 games? That would make his return our home opener against the Ravens.... [Reply]
Originally Posted by FringeNC:
Why would they only excerpt parts that were damaging to Hill? I get the whole SJW infestation thing, but why would they think they could get away with it? What a clown show the media is in this country. Fake News indeed.
They KNEW that once the tape became evidence, they'd never get another chance to shape the narrative how they wanted it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Smitty:
Am i missing something? If he waived his rights, it means he did not plead the 5th and told them whatever they asked? Correct?
Exactly, according to Athan, so far. Reek's lawyer said they would work with the investigation- so that is pretty consistent with their previous stance. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
What? The burden of proof is on him. He's the one making a positive statement. And yes he is known for pulling shit out of his ass. That's his whole reputation.
Originally Posted by -King-:
What? The burden of proof is on him. He's the one making a positive statement. And yes he is known for pulling shit out of his ass. That's his whole reputation.
This is something that will be verified eventually. Probably from Reeks's lawyer.
It is a bold move for Athan if he legitimately does not have any source on this. [Reply]
