Originally Posted by Al Bundy:
The Royals could have had Teel, but they took someone that is middling around in low A.
One could argue that an .870 OPS by a 19-year-old in Single-A is as impressive, if not more so, than an .854 OPS by a 22-year-old in AA.
Pretty easily.
I was not a fan of the Mitchell pick, and the K rate bears watching, but he has been really encouraging so far this year and is cracking top 75 lists pretty consistently.
[Reply]
Teel is obviously the safer pick and comes with less risk.
But it's still up in the air who is going to be the better player between Mitchell and Teel.
[Reply]