Raiders are poised to pursue quarterback Tom Brady if he doesn't re-sign with the Patriots before free agency begins, league sources told ESPN.https://t.co/rAloZCF2W1
I like the fact that the Raiders are sending the underlying message out to their team that Carr is not the guy. Great for team chemistry this off-season even if Brady doesn't go to Vegas. [Reply]
Gruden has to be thinking,”I come out of the booth to coach, and one of the greatest QBs in NFL history just happens to blossom on my rival’s team a year after I’m here”.
While I think Brady under center in Oakland is a fools errand, it makes plenty of sense for a team moving into a new stadium in a new city.
And next season he can still beat up on the AFC East
Home Games:
Denver Broncos
Kansas City Chiefs
Los Angeles Chargers
Buffalo Bills
Miami Dolphins
New Orleans Saints
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Indianapolis Colts
Road Games:
Atlanta Falcons
Carolina Panthers
Cleveland Browns
Denver Broncos
Kansas City Chiefs
Los Angeles Chargers
New England Patriots
New York Jets
With Brady under center I think it looks like they could go at worse 8-8 and at best 10-6.
Its a short-term solution but WTF will the Raiders do long-term at QB. Yeah they have the picks to trade up in this draft but if they are signing Brady, they need to draft one of these young stud WRs. [Reply]
This if from the Athletic. The Raiders just want to get rid of Carr. Brady is an option but they are also looking at others like Tannehill.
Originally Posted by :
—Meanwhile the Raiders, for all their messages about loving Carr, have been working behind the scenes to find a replacement. I have written several times about the disconnect between Carr and Raiders head coach Jon Gruden and this quarterback market is too tempting for Gruden to ignore. Carr has trade value, which is why everyone from the Raiders always says beautiful things about his future when speaking publicly. But Carr has no future in Las Vegas and Gruden will do everything in his power to fix the position. Will Brady entertain Vegas? It’s hard for me to see Gruden and Brady co-existing even though both men have a competitive drive. The Raiders’ offensive line would be appealing to Brady, but would he be willing to run the West Coast offense after so many years in his offense? Call me skeptical.
—I could see the Raiders making a move for Ryan Tannehill if the Titans do not franchise him. Tannehill would give Gruden the athlete he covets at the position, a player capable of making something out of nothing when the play breaks down. Would Tannehill serve as a good bridge player? Yes, though that’s nothing to get too excited about in the long term, because to beat the Chiefs and Mahomes in the AFC West, Gruden is going to need to find his elite player of the future, not just a bridge.
Originally Posted by RunKC:
This if from the Athletic. The Raiders just want to get rid of Carr. Brady is an option but they are also looking at others like Tannehill.
Perfect!
Honestly what's the difference between Brady, Tannehill, Rivers and Carr?
They guy I think I'd go after is Bridgewater.
Regardless you are going to have to overpay for these guys. If it were me I'd try to draft one and just keep Carr for another year [Reply]