ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 3181 of 3903
« First < 2181268130813131317131773178317931803181 31823183318431853191323132813681 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***
JakeF 10:28 PM 02-26-2020
A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana:
Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.
Originally Posted by Dartgod:
People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

[Reply]
Donger 12:27 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by petegz28:
Do you have a link to this graphic on KDHE's website, or anywhere else?
[Reply]
Discuss Thrower 12:30 PM 11-22-2020
"Robust estimates of the true (population) infection rate for COVID-19: a backcasting approach"
[Reply]
BigRedChief 12:48 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by petegz28:
It's not my fault they shoved your bullshit back in your face. Just accept it and move on.
Originally Posted by petegz28:
Otherwise you twats might actually read what is said and not what you want it to say.
Originally Posted by petegz28:
Maybe before any of you little girls throw more temper tantrums over the article I posted
This is not DC. You don't have to use personal insults to discuss the competency of a study.

I just don't want to participate in hurling personal insults. Thats why I left DC 4 years ago. I'll not be responding to your posts anymore in this thread.
[Reply]
petegz28 01:10 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by Monticore:
So you doing the same thing in the opposite direction is supposed to help?
I didn't post misleading info. I am sorry if the numbers are not what you like or whatever. That doesn't mean they are wrong. Just that you don't like them, I guess.
[Reply]
petegz28 01:11 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
This is not DC. You don't have to use personal insults to discuss the competency of a study.

I just don't want to participate in hurling personal insults. Thats why I left DC 4 years ago. I'll not be responding to your posts anymore in this thread.
Maybe you should practice a bit of what you preach then?? :-)
[Reply]
petegz28 01:15 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Do you have a link to this graphic on KDHE's website, or anywhere else?
Do I have a link to the graphic the Sentinel made using the data they clearly show you in the graphic where they got the data from for the graphic???

:-)
[Reply]
TLO 01:15 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower:
"Robust estimates of the true (population) infection rate for COVID-19: a backcasting approach"
I can't get this to open on my phone. What does it say?
[Reply]
Donger 01:22 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by petegz28:
Do I have a link to the graphic the Sentinel made using the data they clearly show you in the graphic where they got the data from for the graphic???

:-)
Yes. Or a link to the actual data. You do realize that that graphic completely contradicts the study's findings, yes?
[Reply]
petegz28 01:24 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Yes. Or a link to the actual data. You do realize that that graphic completely contradicts the study's findings, yes?
Sure it does, Donger.
[Reply]
Donger 01:28 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by petegz28:
Sure it does, Donger.
Great. So, presuming the data is accurate, you think KDHE and the CDC deceptively ignored it and concluded that cases decreased in mask-mandated counties?
[Reply]
petegz28 01:31 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Great. So, presuming the data is accurate, you think KDHE and the CDC deceptively ignored it and concluded that cases decreased in mask-mandated counties?
Poor Donger....
[Reply]
Donger 01:35 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by petegz28:
Poor Donger....
Is that a yes?

Poor me? I'm not the one swallowing data which confirms your bias that you haven't verified, and doesn't make any sense to begin with.
[Reply]
'Hamas' Jenkins 01:37 PM 11-22-2020
Of the 9054 registered users on this site, pete has more posts in this thread than 8488 of them have posts on the entire site in its history.
[Reply]
petegz28 01:37 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Is that a yes?

Poor me? I'm not the one swallowing data which confirms your bias that you haven't verified, and doesn't make any sense to begin with.
:-)

I didn't realize I had to verify it. Why don't you show us where the data is wrong?

:-)
[Reply]
petegz28 01:38 PM 11-22-2020
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
Of the 9054 registered users on this site, pete has more posts in this thread than 8488 of them have posts on the entire site in its history.
Oh we are back to counting my posts again??? :-)

Some of you need to find better things to do with your time if the amount of my posts concerns you.
[Reply]
Page 3181 of 3903
« First < 2181268130813131317131773178317931803181 31823183318431853191323132813681 > Last »
Up