That was the Bengals for the record.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]

Wrong, no. Steelers pissed down their legs then whopped the living shit out of Cleveland once they woke up
[Reply]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]

We watched 2 very different games.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]

CLE won. Both times. And it's PIT's own fault they 'pissed down their legs,' though I'd use much stronger language than that for what they did in that first Q. But the final score quite undeniably says that CLE owned PIT in that game.

Though, for the record, I didn't predict they'd win the second one. Just that they could. i actually said a couple times that CLE would probably lose on Sunday. Glad to be wrong.
[Reply]

5 unforced turnovers. Outgained Cleveland by about 200 yards. Fits in with their fluke of a season quite well.
[Reply]

:-)
[Reply]

Cleveland scored TDs on many of those turnovers. To say Cleveland did nothing special while assuming Pittsburgh completely lost the game is disingenuous.
[Reply]

NEVER FORGET!


What were we talking about again?
[Reply]

NEVER FORGET!


What were we talking about again?
[Reply]

Bengals / Browns-- same difference.

I was at that game, so I dislike all teams that start with a B. :-)

Those dog masks are kind of creepy too.

I am sure there are other reasons too besides your ugly uniforms and mouthy back-up RB.

I am thinking... :-)
[Reply]

Doh
[Reply]

Pleasantly surprised. I clicked through to one of their forums earlier and was greeted with a massive inferiority complex, between the top several threads and many posts. Chiefs are underestimating us, national media still hates us, Steelers gave us no credit..... it was worse than this place prior to Mahomes. :-)

Nice to see some level headed individuals stop by.
[Reply]

Fair enough. I only remembered it being the Bengals because I was fresh out of Basic and caught the game while awaiting my flight home.
[Reply]

Hockey begins tomorrow.
[Reply]

Though it hardly matters now, I think CLE scored a TD on every PIT T/O.

The Browns of old, the "Browns is the Browns" team would've mucked that up. They would've only scored on 1 or 2 of them, FG probably, and somehow managed to give the ball back to PIT the other 3 times.

The Browns of old would've knocked that first T/O out the back of the EZ, instead of falling on it for a TD.

No, PIT might've gifted CLE with 4 extra possessions, but CLE executed their offense and found a way to score TDs off them. Just about every time, if not every time.

The old Browns wouldn't have been able to do that. Not ever.
[Reply]