I understand the heat Veach is getting for win now moves. They are well founded and I don’t disagree.
I have to wonder if this is also Andy’s philosophy. He knows he’s over 60 and could have a heart attack at any time. It’s extremely common for an obese man of his age. Wouldn’t surprise me if he is wanting to go all in while Pat is making pennies bc he knows it may be his last chance. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
I understand the heat Veach is getting for win now moves. They are well founded and I don’t disagree.
I have to wonder if this is also Andy’s philosophy. He knows he’s over 60 and could have a heart attack at any time. It’s extremely common for an obese man of his age. Wouldn’t surprise me if he is wanting to go all in while Pat is making pennies bc he knows it may be his last chance.
Originally Posted by RunKC:
I understand the heat Veach is getting for win now moves. They are well founded and I don’t disagree.
I have to wonder if this is also Andy’s philosophy. He knows he’s over 60 and could have a heart attack at any time. It’s extremely common for an obese man of his age. Wouldn’t surprise me if he is wanting to go all in while Pat is making pennies bc he knows it may be his last chance.
Lol or maybe just maybe this is what ever team does these days while they have a QB on a rookie contract [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
I understand the heat Veach is getting for win now moves. They are well founded and I don’t disagree.
I have to wonder if this is also Andy’s philosophy. He knows he’s over 60 and could have a heart attack at any time. It’s extremely common for an obese man of his age. Wouldn’t surprise me if he is wanting to go all in while Pat is making pennies bc he knows it may be his last chance.
I think it was a combination of Andy getting antsy and knowing his clock is running out (not literally like death lol) and Clark seeing the Pats hoist his dad's trophy in Arrowhead... [Reply]
Originally Posted by KChiefs1:
Chris Ballard would have been great.
He sure looked great last night!!:-) And to think the Colts kicked our ass in the trenches without Darius Leonard with a decimated 2ndary to boot which say's a ton about the talent Ballard has found creating good depth. [Reply]
This is all on Andy and Veach is just a yes man that brings him players to look at so if you want to say Veach sucks in general at finding good players and is great at playing up poor players then ok. Veach's only real trophies are discovering Shady and Mahomes and granted those are huge players BUT YOU HAVE TO BE MORE CONSISTENT ACROSS THE BOARD IN ALL THE POSITIONS on the field. It is clear Andy and Brett are not. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Well it would seem they did it to open up space for this year (potential trades).
Now the question is, who the **** are you gonna get? Needs all over the place.
The brilliance of Ballard was what we did with dumpster moves. We landed guys like Wylie, Reiter, Jaye Howard, Jarvis Jenkins, Terrance Mitchell on the waiver wire. Why are not doing the same thing anymore? Even if one of those guys ends up being average, that's a huge upgrade for cheap.
And I still can't believe we're so inept at drafting interior OL that we can't even get these guys to make the gameday roster. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chiefshrink:
This is all on Andy and Veach is just a yes man that brings him players to look at so if you want to say Veach sucks in general at finding good players and is great at playing up poor players then ok. Veach's only real trophies are discovering Shady and Mahomes and granted those are huge players BUT YOU HAVE TO BE MORE CONSISTENT ACROSS THE BOARD IN ALL THE POSITIONS on the field. It is clear Andy and Brett are not.
Desean Jackson and Fletcher Cox should be included [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Lol or maybe just maybe this is what ever team does these days while they have a QB on a rookie contract
The people wanting to trade 1s for CBs are retards. I remember Seattle getting guys but I'm not convinced the best way is to build through the draft regardless. [Reply]
