Originally Posted by Fish:
A few sites are saying that this could be introducing Professor Hulk. A less primal version of Hulk were Banner is almost completely in charge and can revert to Hulk and back at will.
Judging from the artwork, it looks like Hulk went into "The Fly" chamber and merged with Seth MacFarlane. [Reply]
Originally Posted by JD10367:
Judging from the artwork, it looks like Hulk went into "The Fly" chamber and merged with Seth MacFarlane.
Or.... it's some kind of Shuri derived Wakanda tech that does some fancy awesome Hulk++ shit... it's all black panther colors and everything....... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Fish:
This is just assumed to be a legit leaked photo after all. It also could be an impressive fan made fake and be completely meaningless.
and this is why we can't have nice things! :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace:
I don't know that it's anything mind blowing, but it's just easier to track things from film to film more easily. Examples:
Just in general, keeping track of the infinity stones. Before, I had to go back and look up where each one was, where this time I was able to pretty easily keep track of them.
All of the various iterations of the Iron Man suit throughout the films.
More appreciation for the back-and-forth relationship of Thor and Loki.
Noticing all of the little ways they've tied the various films together.
Spider Man shows up in Civil War, then in Homecoming you see Parker's home video of his experience being "called up."
Watching T'Challa's dad dying at the UN, then watching the results of that in Black Panther.
Similarly, seeing Klaw show up in Civil War first and then noticing he has no arm in Black Panther.
Seeing the Hulk fly off into the sunset in Civil War, then see his ship appear in Ragnarok with the video of Black Widow as he flew away.
Like I said, just lots of little stuff like that.
Not that it's important, but Klaw actually shows up in Age of Ultron. Same with Hulk flying off.
Stark actually asks Romanov as they're assembling their "team" in Civil War if there were any shot she could track Bruce and get him to help. She seems to indicate that she can't, but explicitly says she doubts he'd even be on their side.
One of my favorite little bits of foreshadowing that didn't even have to happen was the Hydra stooge in Cap 2. Cap and Black Widow take him to the rooftop to figure out what Alexander Pierce was up to. (The scene where Cap threatens to throw him off the side of the building but Romanov actually does.)
The stooge starts blabbing about how SHIELD (or Hydra) tracks all major threats, and lists Bruce Banner and Stephen Strange.
Strange's movie doesn't come out for two more years, probably doesn't even have a script or director yet, and if that stooge never mentioned Strange nobody would have given a flip. But it's just awesome how they drop that tidbit in there.
Originally Posted by Direckshun:
Not that it's important, but Klaw actually shows up in Age of Ultron. Same with Hulk flying off.
Stark actually asks Romanov as they're assembling their "team" in Civil War if there were any shot she could track Bruce and get him to help. She seems to indicate that she can't, but explicitly says she doubts he'd even be on their side.
One of my favorite little bits of foreshadowing that didn't even have to happen was the Hydra stooge in Cap 2. Cap and Black Widow take him to the rooftop to figure out what Alexander Pierce was up to. (The scene where Cap threatens to throw him off the side of the building but Romanov actually does.)
The stooge starts blabbing about how SHIELD (or Hydra) tracks all major threats, and lists Bruce Banner and Stephen Strange.
Strange's movie doesn't come out for two more years, probably doesn't even have a script or director yet, and if that stooge never mentioned Strange nobody would have given a flip. But it's just awesome how they drop that tidbit in there.
Having a Jean Grey like character can work on the Avengers, assuming that the power isn't always controllable or there are other elements that prevent it from being used too often. [Reply]
