ChiefsPlanet Mobile
View Poll Results: Are you in favor of releasing Tyreek Hill?
Yes 243 45.25%
No 294 54.75%
Voters: 537. You may not vote on this poll
Page 12 of 77
« First < 289101112 131415162262 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>Are you in favor of releasing Tyreek Hill?
TLO 06:22 PM 04-25-2019
...
[Reply]
BlackOp 09:46 PM 04-25-2019
If they release Hill...he will get counseling, split from his toxic relationship and be a changed man. Thats the PR spin his new team will sell...and Hill's superstar talent will make them forget all about it.

I hope Chunt is patient and lets the legal system play out...
[Reply]
arrwheader 09:47 PM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
The Chiefs are going to fuck themselves hard and he will go play for Denver or Oakland or something awful.



Fuck KCTV5, fuck Brooke Bryor, fuck the Chiefs if they release him.


Thats a glorious trio of fucks. Well done.
[Reply]
keg in kc 09:49 PM 04-25-2019
I don't know enough to make that call.

If they do think they've seen enough to release him I'm fine with that.

The timing of all this seems very odd. Again. Although better now than halfway through the season.
[Reply]
Eleazar 09:49 PM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
If they release Hill...he will get counseling, split from his toxic relationship and be a changed man. Thats the PR spin his new team will sell...and Hill's superstar talent will make them forget all about it.

I hope Chunt is patient and lets the legal system play out...
Do toxic relationships make you punch 3 year olds?
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 09:50 PM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by srvy:
I am in the suspend indefinitely and make the league office rule first. Retain his rights so you dont get burned on the compensation if he ever gets back into the league.
This. Straight releases are for chumps and idiots.
[Reply]
kcpasco 09:50 PM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
Do toxic relationships make you punch 3 year olds?
It’s cool as long as you wait 6 months. All is forgiven.
[Reply]
Eleazar 09:50 PM 04-25-2019
I assume that a lot of the "No" votes are trolling but I don't understand how there could be ANY serious no votes.
[Reply]
RetiredSeniorChief 09:51 PM 04-25-2019
Why release him, when now you can sign him for significantly less money. Take any suspension, get counseling, sign for less $$, win Superbowl.
[Reply]
kcclone 09:51 PM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
He doesn't deserve the ability to play another down in the NFL.
The best thing for his kid (and future twins) is for Hill to keep his income.
[Reply]
Pasta Little Brioni 09:53 PM 04-25-2019
It's total bullshit is what it is. Chiefs are screwed either way they go.
[Reply]
kcpasco 09:53 PM 04-25-2019
Or maybe a lot of the NO votes are because of the NFL’s hypocrisy. I wish someone at the Star would write about that.
[Reply]
Chief_For_Life58 09:54 PM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by TLO:
And if you vote no - you'd better have a good damn reason for doing so.
No because we'll cut him and then some other team will get to sign him and get him for the next 6 years of his prime
[Reply]
cooper barrett 09:54 PM 04-25-2019
Keeping Hill is a NO WAY but holding him at bay and getting good money for him should be a no brainer. How to do that is how the front office demands the money they get.
[Reply]
Eleazar 09:55 PM 04-25-2019
Originally Posted by Chief_For_Life58:
No because we'll cut him and then some other team will get to sign him and get him for the next 6 years of his prime
He won't play a down of football this year. Maybe not next year either.
[Reply]
Bump 09:56 PM 04-25-2019
Only if he's banned from the NFL. He's a shit human being, but we knew that going in and if we cut him then some other team just gets to pick him up cheap while they laugh at us for just handing him over to them. There's no honor in this league. I'm ok with him being perma banned from the NFL tho.
[Reply]
Page 12 of 77
« First < 289101112 131415162262 > Last »
Up