ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 11 of 11
« First < 7891011
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Fox: US attorney recommends proceeding with charges against McCabe...
Just Passin' By 11:41 AM 09-12-2019
Originally Posted by :
US attorney recommends proceeding with charges against McCabe, as DOJ rejects last-ditch appeal

U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu has recommended moving forward with charges against Andrew McCabe, Fox News has learned, as the Justice Department rejects a last-ditch appeal from the former top FBI official.

McCabe -- the former deputy and acting director of the FBI -- appealed the decision of the U.S. attorney for Washington all the way up to Jeffrey Rosen, the deputy attorney general, but the department rejected that request, according to a person familiar with the situation...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-...t-ditch-appeal
[Reply]
patteeu 12:34 PM 02-15-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Do you think that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted?
Why do you think that matters?
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 12:36 PM 02-15-2020
Originally Posted by F150:
Simple question that you likely will get no answer to.
You do your own research, instead of asking on an internet message board like a lazy mofo. Plus learn to read with comprehension.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 12:38 PM 02-15-2020
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
There’s a hole in her head where a brain once stood
They can only shout down others instead of discussing in official environments. Like their overuse of protests and riots.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 12:41 PM 02-15-2020
Originally Posted by HemiEd:
I don't spend much time at this, do we know he is not singing?
There's a thought. Though, we haven't heard if he's flipped. It could be kept secret or Barr is just another DeepState or Swamp Creature as former intel Dr. Pieczenik claims citing his former Barr's CIA background as both an operative and an analyst. He also exonerated everyone involved in Iran-Contra.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 01:13 PM 02-15-2020
And McCabe keeps on lyin'.
This is a man who had been given the power to prosecute liars. Can't make it up! It's not funny though.
There is a 39-page official government report that is titled “A Report of Certain Allegations Relating to Former FBI Director Andrew McCabe.” This report finds that in a number of instances that mattered to us the people McCabe lied, including under oath. The report doesn’t use the term “lie”. It uses the words “lacked candor”.

The dissonance here for anyone who prefers truth to lies, including from public employees of ours in sensitive positions that even have been given the power to prosecute liars, is that McCabe hasn’t owned up to his lies. He betrayed his position, those around him and betrayed us.

Now, he’s accusing others, and that’s certainly no good. He’s making up new lies, and he’s pretending that he’s telling the truth....


McCabe also now blames Trump and the Department of Justice.

But it is entirely accurate to call McCabe a multiple liar on the basis of the report issued by the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice. It ends up as follows:

List of lies found here.
Professor Emeritus of Finance Michael Rozeff

[Reply]
GloryDayz 08:06 PM 02-15-2020
Originally Posted by Loneiguana:
Trunpers are completely clueless to how crazy they sound to the rest of America.
Should I post the county map to show how much of the country "Trumpers" make up, would that help you?

In b4 "hey, we won the PV" (which means nothing since an unreal number of those votes were from illegal and dead people)...
[Reply]
lawrenceRaider 01:53 PM 02-16-2020
Originally Posted by Loneiguana:
Trunpers are completely clueless to how crazy they sound to the rest of America.
Yet you believe Roger Stone belongs in jail for the max for the same thing McCabe us getting to walk on.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 02:21 PM 02-17-2020
Just read this about possible reasons that McCabe is not being charged by Andrew McCarthy at National Review.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/...ccabe-charged/

In it, he brings up that Trump's raging tweets about McCabe deny him the right to fair trial being said beforehand which poisoned the well. since he is the chief law enforcement officer, among some other possible reasons. This denies McCabe due process, his Constitutional right. A president takes an oath to defend the Constitution.

If you want to know why Attorney General Barr was warning this week that the president’s tweets are undermining the Justice Department’s pursuit of its law-enforcement mission, Judge Walton’s words are worth heeding. I have been making this point since the start of the Trump presidency. If you want people held accountable for their crimes, you have to ensure their fundamental right to due process. When the government poisons the well, the bad guys reap the benefits.

Finally, we must note that when the District of Columbia is the venue for any prosecution with political overtones, Justice Department charging decisions must factor in the jury pool, which is solidly anti-Trump.
I get from the latter paragraph it's not a case they can win in a DC jury pool.But it's also why Stone never had a chance, along with the judge and a biased jury foreperson.
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 03:24 PM 02-17-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
Just read this about possible reasons that McCabe is not being charged by Andrew McCarthy at National Review.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/...ccabe-charged/

In it, he brings up that Trump's raging tweets about McCabe deny him the right to fair trial being said beforehand which poisoned the well. since he is the chief law enforcement officer, among some other possible reasons. This denies McCabe due process, his Constitutional right. A president takes an oath to defend the Constitution.

[INDENT]If you want to know why Attorney General Barr was warning this week that the presidentís tweets are undermining the Justice Departmentís pursuit of its law-enforcement mission, Judge Waltonís words are worth heeding. I have been making this point since the start of the Trump presidency. If you want people held accountable for their crimes, you have to ensure their fundamental right to due process. When the government poisons the well, the bad guys reap the benefits.
That argument holds no water.
[Reply]
Shields68 03:31 PM 02-17-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
[B]



I get from the latter paragraph it's not a case they can win in a DC jury pool.But it's also why Stone never had a chance, along with the judge and a biased jury foreperson.
The sad thing is that if it did not involved Trump, it could have been a easy case to win.

I mean a cop lying. Not only lying but leaking to make himself look good, the Obama administration bad and implying Clinton is corrupt. The DC jury pool would have been all over those facts.
[Reply]
Page 11 of 11
« First < 7891011
Up