ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 7 of 10
« First < 34567 8910 >
Washington DC and The Holy Land>SCOTUS Strikes Down LA Abortion Ban
RodeoPants2 09:16 AM 06-29-2020
Remember when Susan Collins believed Kavanaugh when he said Roe was settled law?


Originally Posted by :
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined the court’s liberals in striking down the law, saying it was required by the court’s decision overturning a Texas law in 2016.
“The legal doctrine of stare decisis requires us, absent special circumstances, to treat like cases alike,” Roberts wrote in concurring with the decision. “The Louisiana law imposes a burden on access to abortion just as severe as that imposed by the Texas law, for the same reasons. Therefore Louisiana’s law cannot stand under our precedents.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...4c6_story.html
[Reply]
NinerDoug 04:03 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Is it a major burden for abortionists to get admitting privileges?
Yes, apparently it is, and the requirement has no rational purpose.
[Reply]
srvy 04:36 PM 06-29-2020
We need to pay for Justice Robert's all expense paid hunting lodge trip. The one with thick cushy pillows where you sleep like a dead man.
[Reply]
Loneiguana 04:46 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Ok. Get comfortable.
Yawn.
[Reply]
Loneiguana 04:46 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
Yes, apparently it is, and the requirement has no rational purpose.
Nor did survive a previous s.c. ruling.
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 04:54 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Is it a major burden for abortionists to get admitting privileges?
That's not relevant though, the requirement itself doesn't make sense
[Reply]
NinerDoug 04:55 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
That's not relevant though, the requirement itself doesn't make sense
It is relevant to the actual purpose of the law.
[Reply]
Merde Furieux 05:08 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
Remember when Susan Collins believed Kavanaugh when he said Roe was settled law?




https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...4c6_story.html
Awesome we can continue to exterminate black babies.
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 05:18 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
It is relevant to the actual purpose of the law.
lol right
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 05:19 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by Merde Furieux:
Awesome we can continue to exterminate black babies.
Probably not racist amiright donger
[Reply]
Merde Furieux 05:25 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
Probably not racist amiright donger
As long as the New Orleans Planned Parenthood extermination mills stay open, I m good!

Thank you, Supreme Court!
[Reply]
MahiMike 07:39 PM 06-29-2020
Hell yeah, more dead babies. Black lives don't matter.
[Reply]
patteeu 09:06 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
That's not relevant though, the requirement itself doesn't make sense
I don’t know whether it makes sense or not, but the rational purpose test shouldn’t be hard to meet. On the surface, it seems like it might be good to have connections to a local hospital in case things go wrong.
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 10:20 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
I don’t know whether it makes sense or not, but the rational purpose test shouldn’t be hard to meet. On the surface, it seems like it might be good to have connections to a local hospital in case things go wrong.

Why not require it for tooth extraction? Or iud insertions? Or cortisol injections?

In case something goes wrong
[Reply]
patteeu 10:29 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
Why not require it for tooth extraction? Or iud insertions? Or cortisol injections?

In case something goes wrong
You could do that. It seems like a good thing for the legislature to hold hearings about and debate so they can draw lines.
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 10:30 PM 06-29-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
I don’t know whether it makes sense or not, but the rational purpose test shouldn’t be hard to meet. On the surface, it seems like it might be good to have connections to a local hospital in case things go wrong.

Also are you suggesting a hospital would turn away someone having a medical emergency due to something “went wrong” because their doesn’t have admitting privileges?
[Reply]
Page 7 of 10
« First < 34567 8910 >
Up