Of course the Texans are going to SAY they aren't trading him. They aren't going to close off any of their options. They will be trying to repair the relationship via the new HC. But if as Shefter reported Watson's anger with the Texans is a 10 out of 10 then it's hard to see how that gets fixed. If Watson is willing to sit out the season and give up however much money that would cost him, then a trade will probably get done. Is he that committed? [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
Go get him, Washington.
That would be the "easiest" path to get to the Super Bowl IMO.
Obviously get out of the AFC and avoid Mahomes is the first step, and then go to a team that plays in a weak division, on a team that already has a defense/some parts on offense in place and will be in an NFC in transition next season depending on what happens with Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, etc. [Reply]
1. No trade clause - Deshaun can basically pick where he is willing to go
2. He has the same agent as Jalen Ramsey when he wanted out of Jacksonville. If he wants out, he is getting out of Houston
I think it is funny that the team with the most draft capital is the Dolphins. If that trade were to happen half of the picks would just be a return of picks that BoB used to get Tunsil and Stills. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hydrae:
A couple of things to keep in mind:
1. No trade clause - Deshaun can basically pick where he is willing to go
2. He has the same agent as Jalen Ramsey when he wanted out of Jacksonville. If he wants out, he is getting out of Houston
I think it is funny that the team with the most draft capitol is the Dolphins. If that trade were to happen half of the picks would just be a return of picks that BoB used to get Tunsil and Stills. :-)
You probably should trade him out of conference if at all possible. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
Throw in another first round pick then. It gives them a RB who will sell tickets and a malcontent CB who would yell at the fans.
If those guys aren't hardcore christians, I don't see it. [Reply]