Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
The use of the word "psyop" should make everyone's bullshit detector go off immediately.
I already knew you were basically a propagandized chimp with a language, but I think you've hit a new bar.
You don't think that intelligence agencies engage in psychological operations?
You're acting out the exact reaction that the people behind this operation wanted all along. How far would you like the government to go to crackdown on the people you don't agree with politically? You and many others already seem completely fine with censorship. Where should the line be? How do you think the other side is going to react by being politically ostracized, de-platformed and potentially more?
Originally Posted by True North:
I already knew you were basically a propagandized chimp with a language, but I think you've hit a new bar.
You don't think that intelligence agencies engage in psychological operations?
Of course they do, but "psyop" is a popular buzzword for Qtards who can't find their asses with both hands, but believe they have knowledge the majority of us do not.
Originally Posted by True North:
You're acting out the exact reaction that the people behind this operation wanted all along.
You can't even prove there is an operation, yet you speak of it as if you know it's real.
Originally Posted by True North:
How far would you like the government to go to crackdown on the people you don't agree with politically? You and many others already seem completely fine with censorship. Where should the line be?
What examples of government censorship are you referring to? Or maybe you are talking about Big Tech, meaning you think the government should go full commie and force them to run their businesses a certain way.
Originally Posted by True North:
How do you think the other side is going to react by being politically ostracized, de-platformed and potentially more?
By falling hook, line, and sinker for the dumbest conspiracy theory ever. [Reply]
Originally Posted by True North:
I already knew you were basically a propagandized chimp with a language, but I think you've hit a new bar.
You don't think that intelligence agencies engage in psychological operations?
You're acting out the exact reaction that the people behind this operation wanted all along. How far would you like the government to go to crackdown on the people you don't agree with politically? You and many others already seem completely fine with censorship. Where should the line be? How do you think the other side is going to react by being politically ostracized, de-platformed and potentially more?
Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
Adolt is a conspiracy NUTTER, hook , line, and stinker. [Reply]
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
Of course they do, but "psyop" is a popular buzzword for Qtards who can't find their asses with both hands, but believe they have knowledge the majority of us do not.
You can't even prove there is an operation, yet you speak of it as if you know it's real.
What examples of government censorship are you referring to? Or maybe you are talking about Big Tech, meaning you think the government should go full commie and force them to run their businesses a certain way.
By falling hook, line, and sinker for the dumbest conspiracy theory ever.
Amazing. So because Q Tards use a pretty generic phrase, that phrase is forever tarnished. The term "psyop" existed long before the Q Anon movement.
Because intelligence agencies typically brief the targets of their clandestine intelligence operations. These agencies are so well known for their transparency.
The government should make a determination on Twitter and Facebook. They can't be both a platform and a publisher to flip back and forth between when it suits them. It's the government that has enabled these "businesses" from the beginning.
I'm not saying they should be free from ridicule. Surely you can see how the divisiveness is ramping it up, it's only gonna get worse.
