Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Reuter was really good in the TB game. Hell, even Wiley played better than he has. Maybe they're both getting used to Wiley at RG.
ummm...wha?
That's not what I saw at all. I saw Suh being a real problem. 5 tackles, one for a loss and a QB hit. While being doubled most snaps by my eye.
If it was any mere mortal at QB we'd have been in real trouble.
It's not a mere mortal of course, it's Patrick fucking Mahomes and we're the luckiest fans in football to have him.
Doesn't change the fact that Wiley and Reiter are in need of being replaced.
I understand not really watching the line as it's so much more fun to watch the ball, but I've been watching the line closely and no, they're not good.
It's not a dumpster fire, and it is what it is due to injury, but I am hopeful Wiz can jump in there and take RG as soon as possible.
And next season, we need to look at upgrading too. [Reply]
That's not what I saw at all. I saw Suh being a real problem. 5 tackles, one for a loss and a QB hit. While being doubled most snaps by my eye.
If it was any mere mortal at QB we'd have been in real trouble.
It's not a mere mortal of course, it's Patrick fucking Mahomes and we're the luckiest fans in football to have him.
Doesn't change the fact that Wiley and Reiter are in need of being replaced.
I understand not really watching the line as it's so much more fun to watch the ball, but I've been watching the line closely and no, they're not good.
It's not a dumpster fire, and it is what it is due to injury, but I am hopeful Wiz can jump in there and take RG as soon as possible.
And next season, we need to look at upgrading too.
Reiter is a FA and Wiley is a RFA in the upcoming offseason.
Chiefs will draft at least one IOL to replace them. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Valiant:
It also helps a lot that mahomes knows when to run from the sack. If we had smith still he would be getting sacked 6 times a game on average.
If the Chiefs had Alex Smith they'd have a completely different scheme. [Reply]
Obviously they did enough to win, but something has to change on this OL in the off-season. The offense becomes one dimensional in the red zone and has to use trick plays too often to score. They usually work, but when they don’t it gets a bit ugly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by OKchiefs:
Obviously they did enough to win, but something has to change on this OL in the off-season. The offense becomes one dimensional in the red zone and has to use trick plays too often to score. They usually work, but when they don’t it gets a bit ugly.
The OL was getting beat often tonight. That DEN front is pretty legit, I have to admit. However, even so, the offense scored at least two more TDs than were actually tallied because the refs were idiots.
But yeah, the OL is a patch-work jury-rigged ugly thing, and Patrick should have a better OL to work behind. Hopefully they do something about it over the offseason. [Reply]
Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
Did everyone seem to forget that we had 2 OL opt out, lost a starting G to injury, and lost Schwartz to injury?
I get that the OL hasn’t been great, but I wouldn’t put this on Veach. It’s a pretty flukey situation IMO.
Would we really have been that much better with the OL opt outs? LDT at this point isn’t much better than what we have now, and Niang is a rookie coming back from a significant injury.
I’m not exactly pleased with what Veach has done on the OL, but it is what it is for now. Next year though, they need to invest some resources. They are doing about as well as can be expected right now, so kudos to the current guys for that. [Reply]