LB 45 32.37%

CB 87 62.59%

RB 2 1.44%

Another position (I'll elaborate below) 5 3.60%

OL
[Reply]

Throw a dart.
[Reply]

I'm going to go with CB, though LB is probably a close second.

Breeland seems nice, and Ward looks OK. Fuller is fine as the nickel. There looks to be absolutely no serviceable depth at the CB position. Maybe MC comes in and makes an impact after his suspension, but I'm not confident.
[Reply]

Toss up between CB and TE.
[Reply]

LB probably has the most unknowns.
[Reply]

LB

I think atleast Breeland will be good at CB
[Reply]

TE is a position, as a group, that woefully lacks depth.
[Reply]

Interior OL
[Reply]

I think the TE thing is way overblown. Bell or Yelder can give you the production that Harris has over the past few years. (Really any TE in football can do that) As long as Kelce stays healthy, I don't see it as an issue.

If Kelce goes down we're just as fucked as we were with Harris on the team.
[Reply]

I agree with this as well. I've been encouraged by the overall speed of the LB group though, (minus Ragland).
[Reply]

LB easy
[Reply]

CB will get the most blame, but our LBs are going to hurt us all year more than our CBs will. If we stay healthy, our starting CBs are good enough to get the job done. Even if our starting LBs stay healthy, we're gonna be gouged a lot by teams.

I shouldn't have been expecting miracles from Darron Lee, but I honestly thought we were getting a better player than this. I watched him cover against the Bengals, and while he had decent coverage on a lot of plays, he seemed to allow a completion every single time he was targeted.
[Reply]

lb then cb
[Reply]

Ha ok. TE may not be deep, but we have the best starting group in the league.
[Reply]