Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin:
You remember Chicago trading up from 3 to 2 to take Trubisky and gave up several picks to do it. Teams get attached to a particular player and can't control themselves.
I bet we have 5 teams begging to get to 32 and grab that 5th year option.
Yup.
32 is an ideal trade spot.
Gets to the end of the day. Player (or a couple) no one expected to be there is there. Several teams interested in trading up as it’s the last pick of the day, and as mentioned, the 5th year option.
If the Chiefs wait it out there at draft time, I have no doubt they’ll have several interested suitors for that pick.
So if a guy is there that the Chiefs REALLY love and absolutely have to have, they’ll take him. But if there are several still available that they like there, the you trade down into the second, take one of them when your picks gets there and pocket the extra draft revenue. [Reply]
WITH ALL THIS TALENT AVAILABLE AT #32, WHY WOULD ANY TEAM TRADE UP?
NOT HAPPENING FOLKS.
You'll have teams that want to trade back into the first to draft a guy they really like and take advantage of having him under team control for an extra year. [Reply]
With the new CBA rules on the 4th and 5th round options on the 1st round picks, I wonder if teams may try and steer clear of having to deal with that 5th year? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Couch-Potato:
1. Queen ILB
2. Hall CB
3. Moss RB
4. Gibson WR/RB/ST
5. Best Available OL
Pretty damn good, Bro. Here’s how I’d handle it...
1. HB J.K. Dobbins
2. CB Jaylon Johnson
3. ILBer Logan Wilson
4. OG Jon Runyan
5. WR James Proche [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigChiefFan:
Pretty damn good, Bro. Here’s how I’d handle it...
1. HB J.K. Dobbins
2. CB Jaylon Johnson
3. ILBer Logan Wilson
4. OG Jon Runyan
5. WR James Proche