Originally Posted by FAX:
I'm sure this has already been discussed, however ...
I should like to mention that (concerning the play to Harry in which he was ruled OOB at the 3-yard line with 13:22 left in the 4th) Badger was blocked in the back. Badger was coming hard on Harry and would have dropped him for no gain had it not been for that illegal block by #11.
It was that block that sprung (sprang? sprunged? springled?) Harry and enabled him to get to the sideline.
Just want that on the record.
FAX
Shhhh, there is no way that they were beaten by a team with more talent who took away the quick pass with a fantastic scheme and dominated the trenches all game. It was because the refs screwed them. Also ignore that the Chiefs had over 100 more penalty yards accepted against them. [Reply]
Can’t link right now, but apparently Brittney and Patrick’s brother had to be moved to a “safe area” because of all the physical threats... stay classy, you piece of shit pat’s fans [Reply]
Originally Posted by FAX:
I'm sure this has already been discussed, however ...
I should like to mention that (concerning the play to Harry in which he was ruled OOB at the 3-yard line with 13:22 left in the 4th) Badger was blocked in the back. Badger was coming hard on Harry and would have dropped him for no gain had it not been for that illegal block by #11.
It was that block that sprung (sprang? sprunged? springled?) Harry and enabled him to get to the sideline.
Just want that on the record.
FAX
The :20 mark has the play, and obvious block in the back (that, unlike several against the chiefs, actually impacted the play).
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
Can’t link right now, but apparently Brittney and Patrick’s brother had to be moved to a “safe area” because of all the physical threats... stay classy, you piece of shit pat’s fans
Originally Posted by FAX:
I'm sure this has already been discussed, however ...
I should like to mention that (concerning the play to Harry in which he was ruled OOB at the 3-yard line with 13:22 left in the 4th) Badger was blocked in the back. Badger was coming hard on Harry and would have dropped him for no gain had it not been for that illegal block by #11.
It was that block that sprung (sprang? sprunged? springled?) Harry and enabled him to get to the sideline.
Just want that on the record.
FAX
And Dorsett had full cloth on Ward's jersey outside the shoulder pad. I think the guidance on holding jerseys during a block is that it has to be in front and below top of shoulder pads. [Reply]
Just re-watched the game and the punt block was due to a illegal hit on the snapper which opened the hole for the person to make the block. Should have been negated hence the second touchdown should have been null. The Harry TD is a moot point if that would have been accounted for. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
First they boo'd the team ... then Pats fans FOUGHT EACH OTHER after Tom Brady's squad lost to the Chiefs -- and it's all on video.
It was peak embarrassment at Gillette Stadium where even the TV announcers calling the game clowned Pats fans for having the audacity to BOO while the team was down at halftime.
But, it got even worse AFTER the game, when a couple of Pats fans in the disappointed crowd turned on each other and began throwing punches right in the stands.
At one point, one of the combatants took TWO left-handed bombs to the face ... and you can hear in the audio, people were pretty disgusted by the scrap.
Unclear how the issues were resolved ... we're still waiting to hear back from the Foxborough Police Dept.
As for the Pats on the field ... it's understandable why some fans are going crazy after their games these days -- Brady and the guys look NOTHING like future Super Bowl champs.
Still, 10 Super Bowl appearances in 20 years with 6 NFL titles ... oh, and they're 10-3 this season, heading to the playoffs AGAIN! Calm down, Beantown!!!!!
Meanwhile, Tom's already claimed the team is focusing on next week's game against Cincinnati ... so, sorry, Andy Dalton.
