Originally Posted by Callidus:
He was a scat back. That is not a insult. I know he averaged 5ypc over his career and was a great receiving back. But that dosn't change the style he played. I was just saying that Henry is different type of animal. It is like comparing a cheetah to a rhino.
You clearly don’t know what a scat back is.
Take 5 minutes to go YouTube Jamaal Charles vs. the Seahawks, 2014. Then get back to us. Or don’t, that’d be great too. [Reply]
Originally Posted by CervezaChill:
This post might age like milk but more I look into this match up this has all the makings of a routine walk in the park win for the Chiefs. Almost a boring let down for the neutrals watching.
Don't turn it over
Don't give short fields
It's what the Titans have had the last 2 games.
In the Ravens game the Titans scored 1 time when they had to drive the field. Their other 3 scores came on fields that started inside the 50.
They had to punt every time they had to drive the field except once. [Reply]
By the same token the Pats game was a fucking punt fest. If the Pats had any kind of an offense whatsoever they would have lit up the Titans.
The fact is though a few of us, me included, saw the Ttians beating both the Pats and Ravens. The Pats have shit for offense and the Ravens rested their starters too long and it showed. Coupled with just terrible coaching decisions. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Callidus:
He was a scat back. That is not a insult. I know he averaged 5ypc over his career and was a great receiving back. But that dosn't change the style he played. I was just saying that Henry is different type of animal. It is like comparing a cheetah to a rhino.
I mean, would you call current Christian mccaffery a scat back? [Reply]
What is your definition of a scat back? To me it is smaller faster back who is most effective in space or catching the ball. Like I said that was not a insult in any way. Sure he could run up the middle but that wasn't his best asset. He is like McCoy or Sanders. I think this is us having different definitions more than a disagreement. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Callidus:
What is your definition of a scat back? To me it is smaller faster back who is most effective in space or catching the ball. Like I said that was not a insult in any way. Sure he could run up the middle but that wasn't his best asset. He is like McCoy or Sanders. I think this is us having different definitions more than a disagreement.
How does this Tits fan still have green rep??
EDIT : there we go. Second Tits fan I've turned red [Reply]
I would call cj2k a scat back as well. Sure he ran inside the numbers but that wasn't his game. It just might be my idea of the term but I did not mean to offend. [Reply]
