Originally Posted by Marcellus:
You think we lost the game because we depended on Mahomes too much?
When you pass so much it allows the time of possession to be shorter as if you were running the ball you would take time off the clock. With Moore they were running the ball but Mahomes first game back he threw 50 passes!! [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
When you pass so much it allows the time of possession to be shorter as if you were running the ball you would take time off the clock. With Moore they were running the ball but Mahomes first game back he threw 50 passes!!
So for 8 weeks the answer to beating the Chiefs was "Keep Mahomes and the offense off the field, keep the game tight and win it late".
Now YOUR position is that we should...keep Mahomes and the offense off the field.
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
So for 8 weeks the answer to beating the Chiefs was "Keep Mahomes and the offense off the field, keep the game tight and win it late".
Now YOUR position is that we should...keep Mahomes and the offense off the field.
Yeah, you're an idiot.
My position is to run the fucking ball. Guess what?? That allows the Chiefs to have more time on the field [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
When you pass so much it allows the time of possession to be shorter as if you were running the ball you would take time off the clock. With Moore they were running the ball but Mahomes first game back he threw 50 passes!!
Dumb. Limiting our possession is fucking stupid. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
Dumb. Limiting our possession is ****ing stupid.
I would rather take more time off the clock than more possessions. Our defense can’t stop anything. You would give the opponent also more chances on the field and since our defense can’t stop shit they will be on the field longer and be more gassed [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
Saunders only played 25% of the defensive snaps and Ragland only played 17 snaps!! We also sat Pennel. No wonder why we couldn’t stop the run
This is the story of the game. I mean, WTF. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
This is the story of the game. I mean, WTF.
It’s like Spags thought the Titans were a passing team. Joey fucking IVie got more snaps than Saunders. IVie got 37% of the defensive snaps. Holy hell Spags [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
Saunders only played 25% of the defensive snaps and Ragland only played 17 snaps!! We also sat Pennel. No wonder why we couldn’t stop the run
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I know an important game against an AFC opponent, who have problems against, is a great time to try and get your rookie RB some playing time.