0 63 27.16%

1 3 1.29%

2 58 25.00%

3 1 0.43%

4 70 30.17%

5 0 0%

6 19 8.19%

7 0 0%

8 9 3.88%

9 0 0%

10 0 0%

11 0 0%

12 0 0%

13 0 0%

14 0 0%

15 0 0%

16 7 3.02%

It's a CHIEFS burger. 🍔 2 0.86%

Who was a winner? I voted 0.
[Reply]

I. Told. You. So.
[Reply]

I thought for sure he'd get 2-4 just due to the high profile nature of the case. For the NFL to say ZERO means he had a pretty fucking convincing case.

That's what these morons don't understand. They keep saying stupid shit like "Zeke got 6 games" blah blah blah.

No shit, we're all aware of how heavy handed the NFL is. The fact that he got ZERO speaks volumes you dumb cunts.
[Reply]

such conviction
[Reply]

Would voting now be considered cheating?
[Reply]

Whitlock, you should be ashamed of yourself...……...
[Reply]

I guessed it correctly while simultaneously dissing John Elway. I think I won the contest.
[Reply]

Well played
[Reply]

I thought the NFL would issue a minor suspension to throw a bone to the howling masses.

I was wrong. His case must be airtight.
[Reply]

I also like the theory that's been proposed that a suspension would make other players more vulnerable to extortion attempts. If they suspend a guy for being a victim, that gives criminals more leverage. All they would have to do is create a scene and it'll cost the player money and career stability. So you have to protect Tyreek in this position and send a message to the bad guys.
[Reply]

Justice prevailed!

Let's see the media start backpedaling now!
[Reply]

My guess was approximately eight games too high.

Now please, please, please, guarantee that semi-human turd the most money ever for a wide receiver.
[Reply]

You're a fucking Browns fan and you wanna talk about turds?

:-)
[Reply]

As I've noted all along, they were NEVER going to suspend him based on the current case. NEVER. The upcoming CBA negotiations would have been a complete disaster following a suspension without cause.

This really wasn't that hard to deduce.
[Reply]

I just voted 16
[Reply]