ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 2 of 4
< 12 34 >
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Judicial Watch Sues to Stop Cali Gov Newsom’s “Vote by Mail” Mandate
BucEyedPea 12:49 PM 05-22-2020
From a Judicial Watch press release that was just sent to members of the media yesterday.
The Judicial Watch complaint argues that Newsom’s Executive Order N-64-20, requiring all California counties to conduct all-mail ballot elections, violates the U.S. Constitution and California state law.

According to the U.S. Constitution, only state legislatures may determine the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives,” and only state legislatures may establish the manner in which electors to the Electoral College are appointed.

The lawsuit points out that “[n]either defendant in this case is a ‘Legislature,’” as required under the Constitution, and “[t]he California Legislature never delegated to [Newsom] its authority under the Elections Clause or Electors Clause to regulate the manner of conducting elections for senators, representatives, or presidential electors.”

Judicial Watch also contends that Newsom’s mandate violates the California Voter’s Choice Act of 2016, which grants counties the option to qualify for and opt in to a system of mail-in voting. Judicial Watch argues the law reflects the legislature’s deliberate choice to delegate to each county the decision about whether to qualify and opt in to the all-mail ballot system. During the March 3, 2020 primary election, only 15 of California’s 58 counties qualified and opted-in to the all-mail balloting system.

The lawsuit alleges the plaintiffs will be harmed by Newsom’s mandate for all-mail voting because it imposes an entirely new election system that ignores the extensive qualifications required by California law before a county can opt in to all-mail balloting. Judicial Watch argues its plaintiffs will be at risk of having their votes thrown out or diluted by invalid votes under Newsom’s illegal system, and that Mr. Issa will have to expend additional resources to respond to the illegal mandate during his campaign.

“Governor Newsom’s vote-by-mail mandate is unconstitutional and may cause the votes of countless voters to be thrown out or not counted,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“California law prohibits blindly mailing out ballots to every registered voter in the state. This scheme raises the risk of Election Day chaos as well as voter fraud.”

In 2018, California settled a federal lawsuit with Judicial Watch and began the process of removing up to 1.6 million inactive names from Los Angeles County’s voter rolls. Judicial Watch late last year sent notices to 11 additional California counties warning them of voting list maintenance issues. Judicial Watch recently sued North Carolina and Pennsylvania to force them to clean up their voter rolls.


https://www.judicialwatch.org/docume...20200522184957

[Reply]
Cosmos 03:39 PM 05-22-2020
Lol...

Mail in voting negatively affects Republican Voter Suppression efforts....this is where the election fraud takes place....right out of the RNC.

YOU’RE NOT AFRAID OF FREE AND FAIR VOTING...UNLESS YOU’RE A REPUBLICAN.

AND THEY CLEARLY KNOW IT.

######

Chris Wallace Demolishes Trump’s Mail-In Voting Lies: ‘No History of Fraud’

Fox News anchor Chris Wallace debunked President Donald Trump’s false claims that fraud is rampant in mail-in voting, noting on Friday morning that there is simply no evidence to support the president’s assertions.

With Trump threatening to withhold federal funds from Nevada and Michigan if they went forward with sending absentee ballots and applications to voters, Wallace—who has been a favorite target of Trump’s— pointed out that the president’s repeated complaints about mail-in voting are largely baseless.

“I’ve done some deep dive into it, there really is no record of massive fraud or even serious fraud from mail-in voting,” the Fox News anchor said on America’s Newsroom. “It’s being carried out in Republican states, it’s being carried out in Democratic states, there is no indication that mail-in voting as opposed to in person voting tends to favor one party over another.”

After explaining that the practice of mailing in votes may even tend to favor Republicans since elderly voters have historically voted most often by mail, Wallace also mentioned that the most famous case of fraudulent “ballot harvesting” involved a Republican in North Carolina.

https://news.yahoo.com/chris-wallace...154810642.html
[Reply]
Loneiguana 03:40 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by cosmo20002:
The next step that has been around for decades.
Army has allowed it since the civil war.
[Reply]
patteeu 03:41 PM 05-22-2020
Why should you have to show a history of actual fraud before you can take common sense anti-fraud measures?
[Reply]
Loneiguana 03:43 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by cosmo20002:
The next step that has been around for decades.
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Why should you have to show a history of actual fraud before you can take common sense anti-fraud measures?
Well, when there is a state out there with mail in voting for everyone for nearly 20 years with only 2 actual mail in fraud convictions, the evidence is already very in favor that mail in voting is safe.
[Reply]
CarlosCarson88 03:43 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by Merde Furieux:
And let's just sit back and take it? Some things are in fact, worth dying for.

Or do you choose to live on your knees and just throw shit at everybody else?

Again, your vote doesn't count.
The people have no say. Who you vote for is irrelevant
[Reply]
patteeu 03:47 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by Loneiguana:
Well, when there is a state out there with mail in voting for everyone for nearly 20 years with only 2 actual mail in fraud convictions, the evidence is already very in favor that mail in voting is safe.
That’s not an answer.
[Reply]
NinerDoug 03:56 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by Chief Northman:
Yeah. How dare an organization dedicated to oversight of the judicial machinations of the nation be meddling like that.
They're a bunch of fucking loons.
[Reply]
NinerDoug 03:58 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
And dedicated to the Constitution too.
Horse shit.
[Reply]
vailpass 03:59 PM 05-22-2020
Imagine living with Gavin fucking Newsom as your governor.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 04:22 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by vailpass:
Imagine living with Gavin ****ing Newsom as your governor.
Imagine being married to him like Kimberly Guilfoyle formerly of Fox once was?

He is handsome...and tall! That's about all he has going for him though.
[Reply]
Loneiguana 05:35 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
That’s not an answer.
Oh it was. I'll dumb it down for you. We have ample evidence it's safe and fraud free. To dispute said evidence, present your own.
[Reply]
patteeu 06:34 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by Loneiguana:
Oh it was. I'll dumb it down for you. We have ample evidence it's safe and fraud free. To dispute said evidence, present your own.
The question was, why do we need extensive evidence of fraud to implement common sense anti fraud safeguards? It’s not past fraud we’re trying to prevent, it’s future fraud (mostly by democrats, no doubt).
[Reply]
Loneiguana 06:40 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
The question was, why do we need extensive evidence of fraud to implement common sense anti fraud safeguards? It’s not past fraud we’re trying to prevent, it’s future fraud (mostly by democrats, no doubt).
And the answer is that we have overwhelming evidence there isnt any voter fraud in mail in ballots. Want to say otherwise, show your work.

Otherwise, you are straight talking out of your ass with this "common sense anti fraud safeguards".

Dont need safeguards when its proven there isnt any fraud.

How dumb are you, truly?
[Reply]
vailpass 06:42 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by Loneiguana:
And the answer is that we have overwhelming evidence there isnt any voter fraud in mail in ballots. Want to say otherwise, show your work.

Otherwise, you are straight talking out of your ass with this "common sense anti fraud safeguards".

Dont need safeguards when its proven there isnt any fraud.

How dumb are you, truly?
:-)

TIMMAY!!
[Reply]
NinerDoug 06:42 PM 05-22-2020
Originally Posted by CarlosCarson88:
Again, your vote doesn't count.
The people have no say. Who you vote for is irrelevant
Listen to this guy, Trumpers. He knows what he's talking about.

Take his wisdom to heart. Don't become one of the lemmings, mindlessly following the other lemmings to the polls.

Don't let them make a fool out of you. Show them you know it's all a fraud.
[Reply]
Page 2 of 4
< 12 34 >
Up