According to Google maps it is 500 miles From Argentina to the nearest point in Antarctica. You can look it up yourself. That may be the end of Argentina, but it is not Antarctica from Argentina. It's a nice pic though.
What you are seeing there is an island owned by Chile. [Reply]
I would appreciate constructive criticism on these, and I’d like to know which you like better. If you don’t like either, please try to let me know why.
I'm certainly no expert, but of the two, I prefer the bottom one. The top one is so out of focus that it's "blurry" to me, while the bottom one is more "soft." [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace:
I'm certainly no expert, but of the two, I prefer the bottom one. The top one is so out of focus that it's "blurry" to me, while the bottom one is more "soft."
That seems to be the consensus. It’s weird, I prefer the first because of that blurriness and the effect of negative space that it creates. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace:
I'm certainly no expert, but of the two, I prefer the bottom one. The top one is so out of focus that it's "blurry" to me, while the bottom one is more "soft."
I agree with FMB
I took this last night at my cousins wedding, notice the blurry sign? Makes for a good picture. This was from my iPhone X
Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!:
That seems to be the consensus. It’s weird, I prefer the first because of that blurriness and the effect of negative space that it creates.
I like them both, but prefer the latter.
Little research that you might enjoy is "depth of field" (which is what you were doing), and "circles of confusion" (which is how depth of field is created within the camera's optics.
Just for fun, sometime it's fun to understand the science behind the effect. [Reply]
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
I like them both, but prefer the latter.
Little research that you might enjoy is "depth of field" (which is what you were doing), and "circles of confusion" (which is how depth of field is created within the camera's optics.
Just for fun, sometime it's fun to understand the science behind the effect.
I’m familiar. Dad was a photo J guy and I’ve been shooting for 25 years. [Reply]
Sorry, but both of those images drive my eyes insane. The point of interest isn't located right for me and the percentage of the picture that is foreground blur overpowers my interest.
Oddly, if I mirror flip the image I can almost handle the bottom one with the point of interest on the right. [Reply]
