Originally Posted by htismaqe:
The Raiders aren't a bad team. They're an 8-8 team. They might be marginally better than last year but they're not a playoff team.
More like a 9-7 team who might win 10 games because of a relatively weak schedule after our bye. [Reply]
Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider:
More like a 9-7 team who might win 10 games because of a relatively weak schedule after our bye.
Sorry, I should have explained that better.
By saying they're an 8-8 team, I believe they could finish with anywhere from 7 to 9 wins. They might win 10 games but I think 9 is probably the ceiling. [Reply]
It would have changed everything so who knows how things would look overall at this point, but they could have Antonio Brown if he didn’t lose his mind.
Adding a sane AB to their current roster would worry me, but as things are now I’d say they are probably a 9-7, 10-6 type of squad. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
It would have changed everything so who knows how things would look overall at this point, but they could have Antonio Brown if he didn’t lose his mind.
Adding a sane AB to their current roster would worry me, but as things are now I’d say they are probably a 9-7, 10-6 type of squad.
I love that. Everyone has their own circumstances and hardships, and I love when the children appreciate their parents hardwork. Hopefully that kid gets a second contract so he can retire her. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sorry:
I love that. Everyone has their own circumstances and hardships, and I love when the children appreciate their parents hardwork. Hopefully that kid gets a second contract so he can retire her.
Agree. Last year he got hurt in the first half of the first game and was out for the year. This is essentially his rookie season and we all saw last Sunday his presence is felt in a significant way. This is a vintage 70`s type of football player for sure. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
This is why they "won"...ref ball.
They know it....
Sometimes those just don't get called. It was a bang bang play. It does look like pass interference though especially when it's slowed down then freeze framed. Human judgement calls are always going to be questionable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eureka:
Sometimes those just don't get called. It was a bang bang play. It does look like pass interference though especially when it's slowed down then freeze framed. Human judgement calls are always going to be questionable.
Didn’t mean to upvote this.
It was blatant and should’ve been called. I didn’t even need to see the replay to know it was clearly PI. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Didn’t mean to upvote this.
It was blatant and should’ve been called. I didn’t even need to see the replay to know it was clearly PI.
It is the sole reason the Raiders won the game though correct? That is what he is implying. Chiefs would have went on to score a TD on every possession afterwards.
Like I said it looks like pass interference but to imply that the Chiefs would have won the game with that being a flag is ridiculous OR that refs where trying to help the Raiders win. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eureka:
It is the sole reason the Raiders won the game though correct? That is what he is implying. Chiefs would have went on to score a TD on every possession afterwards.
Like I said it looks like pass interference but to imply that the Chiefs would have won the game with that being a flag is ridiculous OR that refs where trying to help the Raiders win.
I don’t think the refs were necessarily trying to help the Raiders win, but the officiating was absolutely one-sided for whatever reason. They literally took 11 pts off the board, and likely another 7 on this play. How was that not a factor? [Reply]
