Yes, Pitts is a TE, but he's really just a huge-ass WR. Last year there were rumblings that we were very interested in trading up for Ruggs. Veach clearly places an emphasis on surrounding PM with elite talent.
So, that said, if he's available in the 13-16 range, would Veach be willing to move up from 32?
I'd imagine the cost would be #32, a 3rd rounder, and a '22 first-rounder (also probably #32). Basically, the same package we gave up to move from 27 to 10 in 2017.
Note: If EB gets hired by Houston, remember we'll have an extra 3rd this year.
I've been holding my breath al year that Kelce doesn't get hurt. Our offense would be much different. I trust Veach can find us a TE in FA or a later round. Kelce wasn't drafted in rd1. More a fan of moving back rather than up. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin:
Daniel Jeremiah has him going #12 to San Fran
Has KC taking the DT from washington. Could make since in that draft scenario as he's the first DT taken off the board.
When I seen this a few days ago I laughed. Why in the world would they use an high 1st rounder on a TE when they got the 2nd best in the league already? I'm sure there is other areas needed to improve upon first. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin:
I've been holding my breath al year that Kelce doesn't get hurt. Our offense would be much different. I trust Veach can find us a TE in FA or a later round. Kelce wasn't drafted in rd1. More a fan of moving back rather than up.
There's a lot of option for TE this year. Bushman or Ferguson for me. But we could get Kenny Yeboah in the later rounds too. [Reply]
Originally Posted by GingaChief:
When I seen this a few days ago I laughed. Why in the world would they use an high 1st rounder on a TE when they got the 2nd best in the league already? I'm sure there is other areas needed to improve upon first.
This place loves to dream up scenarios of 2 All-Pro TEs on the field at the same time, for some unknown reason. SF isn't drafting Pitts and the Chiefs aren't trading an extra first to move up for him either. [Reply]