"A mother who uses OnlyFans has spoken out after her three sons were reportedly expelled from their Catholic school over her presence on the adult platform.
According to Crystal Jackson, from California, she created an OnlyFans account in 2019 as a way to spice up her relationship with her husband Chris Jackson.
However, according to the mother-of-three, who goes by Tiffany Poindexter, or Mrs Poindexter, on the app, where she told People she makes more than $150,000 a month, her pictures were eventually leaked to Sacred Heart Parish School in Sacramento, where her children went to school."
Any Chiefs fans here subscribe to her site? [Reply]
Originally Posted by vonBobo:
Free pics can be stolen or shared without consent, only fans is nice to know there isn't a karmic price to pay.
The OF performers also get to choose the kind of material they want to make, when they want, and they decide the who with. No creepy producers, no unwanted drugs and alcohol, no coercion.
The performers get to create their own content, express themselves creatively and sexually using their own vision and personal desires. Overall it is just better content than the male oriented lick/suck/pound industry.
Oh... And Only Fans has their content locked and cannot be downloaded, and the content is not available in any freely available manner. Any OF content available somewhere else online would be stealing from the performer. Throwing a favorite performer 5 or 10 bucks is cheaper than lunch from McDonald's.
Whatever makes your freak flag fly, dude. I can't imagine paying for porn these days, but sounds like you are in it for the .... art? [Reply]
If your girl or wife can make a few thousand dollars and not show her face or reveal her identity why not. We have talked about this and it’s just retirement monies. Take all of if and invest it or take awesome vacations while riding the wave. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
I mean, she’s alright, but 150k a month??? That number tells me that way too many young guys in this country haven’t seen a good piece of ass in their lifetimes and/or have mommy issues.
Chicks that look like that are basically giving it away to any average dude who will buy them a few rail drinks. And man, those nipples would instantly turn me off. Looks like she’s been running them through a Jack LaLanne Power Juicer.
its not only this country, its the entire damned world! If they have their subscriptions set at 5-10 dollars a month and they can get between 5k and 20k subscribers. thats ALOT of fucking money. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcxiv:
its not only this country, its the entire damned world! If they have their subscriptions set at 5-10 dollars a month and they can get between 5k and 20k subscribers. thats ALOT of fucking money.
Exactly.
OnlyFans isn't limited to just the United States and there are more than 3.5 Billion men in this world. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcxiv:
its not only this country, its the entire damned world! If they have their subscriptions set at 5-10 dollars a month and they can get between 5k and 20k subscribers. thats ALOT of ****ing money.
Truly crazy stuff. Not to mention women selling their bath water and all that weird shit.
Unreal. It’s easier to make a living for a woman than ever before. Just take advantage of the pathetic men who can’t get a real pussy to save their lives.
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
It’s easier to make a living for a woman than ever before. Just take advantage of the pathetic men who can’t get a real pussy to save their lives.
How is donating to OnlyFans any different than going to strip clubs and tipping strippers? Almost every municapality in the country has a "Look, Don't Touch" policy.
How is it more "pathetic" than hiring $300-$3,000 dollar a night escorts?
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
Just disturbing.
It's no different than Playboy or Hustler or Penthouse except that it's Direct-To-Consumer.
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
Truly crazy stuff. Not to mention women selling their bath water and all that weird shit.
Unreal. It’s easier to make a living for a woman than ever before. Just take advantage of the pathetic men who can’t get a real pussy to save their lives.
Just disturbing.
im willing to bet that at least half of their incomes comes from married dudes not just lonely men! Like Dane said, its just Playboy/hustler direct to the customer now days and the "model" gets 80/20 of the pay. Hell, when my parents were married, my dad still had his porn mags as well. No different really. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
How is donating to OnlyFans any different than going to strip clubs and tipping strippers? Almost every municapality in the country has a "Look, Don't Touch" policy.
How is it more "pathetic" than hiring $300-$3,000 dollar a night escorts?
It's no different than Playboy or Hustler or Penthouse except that it's Direct-To-Consumer.
You're ****ing weird.
It’s not really ‘more’ pathetic I suppose, but I’ve never had to do it so can’t relate. I just couldn’t imagine paying to get my rocks off. It’s just not a thing I’ve ever done. As far as comparing this shit to Playboy and Penthouse, most of those chicks are actually hotter than average bar skanks. This girl is not.
These dames on Only Fans, especially this one, are extremely average women making 150k a month on desperate pathetic men. If you think I’m ‘fucking weird’ for not paying for pics of below average pussy and tits, I guess I’m ok with that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Beef Supreme:
Whatever makes your freak flag fly, dude. I can't imagine paying for porn these days, but sounds like you are in it for the .... art?
