Originally Posted by Bwana:
Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.
Originally Posted by Dartgod:
People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.
We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.
Thanks!
Click here for the original OP:
Spoiler!
Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.
California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.
“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”
The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.
The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”
Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.
The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.
The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.
A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.
Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.
“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”
It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.
“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”
On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.
“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”
According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.
More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.
But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.
“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”
CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.
Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.
“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”
Originally Posted by petegz28:
I remember when he said we didn't need to wear masks back in March too....
He sure did:
LaPook, March 8: There’s a lot of confusion among people, and misinformation, surrounding face masks. Can you discuss that?
Fauci: The masks are important for someone who’s infected to prevent them from infecting someone else… Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks.
Want to guess what hadn't been confirmed when he said the bolded part, pete?
You have the accuracy and range of a Daisy BB gun on this. [Reply]
LaPook, March 8: There’s a lot of confusion among people, and misinformation, surrounding face masks. Can you discuss that?
Fauci: The masks are important for someone who’s infected to prevent them from infecting someone else… Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks.
Want to guess what hadn't been confirmed when he said the bolded part, pete?
You have the accuracy and range of a Daisy BB gun on this.
Rationalize all you want. He said what he said. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
I know a lot of people, people who wear masks, follow the rules, etc. that say they will refuse the vaccine. I can see various Governors and such using the "return to normalcy" as a carrot for people to get vaccinated. Once it's available of course.
If vaccine is available and you choose not to get it, I don't care if you get sick with COVID.
Once I'm vaccinated, life is back to normal for me. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pants:
If vaccine is available and you choose not to get it, I don't care if you get sick with COVID.
Once I'm vaccinated, life is back to normal for me.
I tend to agree but the fact is it will be used in the form of "you are spreading it". Obviously to other people who didn't get the vaccine but I think you get the point.
Shit, after the study that came out today I might already be vaccinated for a long, long time. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
I tend to agree but the fact is it will be used in the form of "you are spreading it". Obviously to other people who didn't get the vaccine but I think you get the point.
Shit, after the study that came out today I might already be vaccinated for a long, long time. :-)
I don't think vaccinated people can spread it and yes, you're fucking set, man. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pants:
I don't think vaccinated people can spread it and yes, you're ****ing set, man.
I joke at work about getting it was a good thing. I was lucky, of course. Didn't end up in the hospital or worse. Finally getting my taste and smell back to about 95% now and feeling less and less fatigued.
In the end if the trade off was a few days of feeling like I had the flu and such for being immune for most likely the rest of my life (if that study is accurate) then it might be a good deal.
Then again, if you end up in the hospital or worse then yea, probably not so much. [Reply]
LaPook, March 8: There’s a lot of confusion among people, and misinformation, surrounding face masks. Can you discuss that?
Fauci: The masks are important for someone who’s infected to prevent them from infecting someone else… Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks.
Want to guess what hadn't been confirmed when he said the bolded part, pete?
You have the accuracy and range of a Daisy BB gun on this.
My Daisy shot true when I had one. Could you never hit your target? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
nope. Dr. Fauci’s stamp of approval will move more to get it than anything else. Not even close.
Dr. Fauci comes out and says I looked at the data and have some concerns, it’s dead in the water. Luckily for us, the data is supposedly great for both vaccines. :-)
You'd probably be surprised by how many "average Joe's" don't even really know who Fauci is.
The vast majority of the average American populace aren't particularly tuned in. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
I joke at work about getting it was a good thing. I was lucky, of course. Didn't end up in the hospital or worse. Finally getting my taste and smell back to about 95% now and feeling less and less fatigued.
In the end if the trade off was a few days of feeling like I had the flu and such for being immune for most likely the rest of my life (if that study is accurate) then it might be a good deal.
Then again, if you end up in the hospital or worse then yea, probably not so much.
We've taken to calling ol' Pete Super Spreader at work. [Reply]
Originally Posted by stumppy:
You know where it comes from.
I'll just tip toe around this subject, like pete does. It's called follow the leader.
As I mentioned the other day, I know a lot of people that don't wear masks, won't get the vaccine, and generally don't care about anybody but themselves.
I also know how many of the vote and it's not for who you are insinuating. [Reply]
After the first responders, high-risk workers and old folks homes - is there going to be some orderly rollout of the vaccine to the rest of us - or will it be like calling for concert tickets in the old days? [Reply]
Originally Posted by suzzer99:
After the first responders, high-risk workers and old folks homes - is there going to be some orderly rollout of the vaccine to the rest of us - or will it be like calling for concert tickets in the old days?
more like buying Chiefs tickets for the Superbowl last year. [Reply]
