ChiefsPlanet Mobile
View Poll Results: Do you support Trump's call for federally funded paid pregnancy leave?
Yes 13 23.64%
No 34 61.82%
Maybe 4 7.27%
I don't believe he will actually try to get it passed 3 5.45%
Other 1 1.82%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll
Page 7 of 8
« First < 34567 8 >
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Do you support Trump's call for federally funded paid pregnancy leave?
NinerDoug 11:47 AM 02-06-2019
Poll coming.

https://www.benefitnews.com/news/tru...n-sotu-address

"I am also proud to be the first president to include in my budget a plan for nationwide paid family leave — so that every new parent has the chance to bond with their newborn child,” Trump said.
[Reply]
Eleazar 03:30 PM 02-08-2019
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
Well, I suppose some wombs are better at producing healthy, live babies than other wombs.

I just thought that use of the word "caliber" with a womb was funny. Like the womb is a weapon that shoots out babies. Maybe even rapid fire.
You see Doug, caliber is a measurement of size. It would indicate the ones with large bore diameters.
[Reply]
Prison Bitch 03:41 PM 02-08-2019
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
High caliber wombs.


That was what I found funny.
Oooookay???? I tried to find the highest caliber womb. Actually she tried to find me as that’s what females are compelled to do biologically. She didn’t want to share her womb with Steve who works as a clerk at Kenny Shoes.

Anyway.
[Reply]
Katipan 05:14 PM 02-08-2019
Originally Posted by luv:
That explains the cost of prenatal care and birth. It does not explain leave.
The whole purpose being to encourage women with jobs to have babies. To not hold out until they're high risk and dusty. More pregnancies mean more money your group will have to spend.

If it was just about all moms and babies, theyd just give us cash along with the hat and nose sucker.
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 08:17 PM 02-08-2019
Originally Posted by luv:
Explain.
say please
[Reply]
HonestChieffan 08:21 PM 02-08-2019
Found Niner...


[Reply]
El Lobo Gordo 12:35 AM 02-10-2019
Not being able to bond with your child because of work is first world problem. In the third world there is no need to take a leave because mom finishes her day's work after giving birth with the new born at her breasts.

Which kid grows up to be the harder worker? A child whose parents got paid leave or a child whose parents took them to work every day?
[Reply]
GloryDayz 02:46 PM 02-10-2019
Liberals will have the baby to get the leave, then snap its neck (or have somebody do it for them) so they don't have any responsibilities in life.
[Reply]
ChiefFanForHire 04:08 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
Only for married people.


Better not encourage illegitimacy.
So you're Pro Welfare?

Having kids is a lifestyle choice, that other people should not have to subsidize.

Say I like playing video games, and support the economy by buying them and paying taxes on them. Should I get 3 months paid every year I play them?
[Reply]
ChiefFanForHire 04:14 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
There is no such thing as a “vacation” with a newborn. If you have kids you know that.
There's no such thing as a vacation from Final Fantasy, or any epic quest video game.

You have to defeat enemies, build up your status, find weapons, beat bosses, and work hard at it.

If you played epic video game quests, you'd know that.

Know what the difference between choosing to play video games, and choosing to poop out a kid? NONE. They are both lifestyle choices, and neither should be rewarded by people who work hard for their money.
[Reply]
ChiefFanForHire 04:19 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
If we want more high caliber wombs producing children (and who doesn’t?), it will need to be subsidized.
So people who are too stupid, too lazy, and too irresponsible to save up enough money to pay for a kid themselves, and need subsidizing to do so, are "high caliber"?

:-)
[Reply]
dlphg9 04:32 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by ChiefFanForHire:
So you're Pro Welfare?

Having kids is a lifestyle choice, that other people should not have to subsidize.

Say I like playing video games, and support the economy by buying them and paying taxes on them. Should I get 3 months paid every year I play them?
Having a child is a little more important than a video game. Women should get some paid time off and the dad should as well. It would be costly though. Around 4 million babies are born every year. The average salary is around 45k. Say a woman got 3 months paid time off, so that 1 person is going to cost tax payers $11,250 on avg. Now take into account 4 million babies are born, so we will put the number of women receiving that benefit is around 3.5 million. So rough estimate of $35-40 billion a year to cover it.
[Reply]
dlphg9 04:36 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by ChiefFanForHire:
So people who are too stupid, too lazy, and too irresponsible to save up enough money to pay for a kid themselves, and need subsidizing to do so, are "high caliber"?

:-)
Not getting paid for 2-3+ months is a good reason to not have. If those working women had incentive to have children then they would. How does that make them stupid, lazy, or irresponsible? Theyre being responsible by not having kids you fucking imbecile.
[Reply]
dlphg9 04:42 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by ChiefFanForHire:
There's no such thing as a vacation from Final Fantasy, or any epic quest video game.

You have to defeat enemies, build up your status, find weapons, beat bosses, and work hard at it.

If you played epic video game quests, you'd know that.

Know what the difference between choosing to play video games, and choosing to poop out a kid? NONE. They are both lifestyle choices, and neither should be rewarded by people who work hard for their money.
Youre probably a 350+ pound neck beard that lives in his moms basement. Im actually convinced you are. You seem to not like women either. Probably hated them ever since you put the moves on your sister and she told you what a fat disgusting creep you are.
[Reply]
HemiEd 06:07 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
That’s all true of course but you missed the main benefit: no immigration. When Steve King says “you can’t maintain your civilization with other people’s babies”, it’s an obvious truism. We can’t. (If you want to create a new civilization that’s another topic entirely. The Left wants to do that.)


We’ve fallen below replacement birth rates. It’s a major argument open borders buttholes use. Natalist policies to get us back to square one will mitigate a lot of that.
Actually, it is true. We need immigrants to compete on the world stage.

Our generation, the baby boomers, were bombarded with population control messages and responsible parenting about the same time as the pill came out.



This practice has backfired on the world stage.
[Reply]
HemiEd 06:09 AM 02-11-2019
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
It's for his daughter Ivanka who is more to the left than Daddy but who has Daddy wrapped around her finger. She proposed this idea at the convention.
I see, makes sense.
[Reply]
Page 7 of 8
« First < 34567 8 >
Up