Movies and TV Justice League (2017) - Page 13

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!:
Not fake news.

I watched both - actually BOUGHT both - based solely on this place. You ****ers owe me $40.

:-) Both those movies are so terrible I have never been able to finish either of them.

The only other movie I can say I could never finish was Alexander when Hollywood decided to make him gay just for the hell of it.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by CoMoChief:
I think the Superhero thing is just so over-saturated between all of the spin off TV/Netflix series etc.

For you, individually, perhaps, but as long as these studios actually put out good movies people will still flock to see them.

Marvel is cleaning up right now and their next Avengers flick will probably break every record ever.
[Reply]

Apparently Matt Reeves is eyeing Jake Gyllenhaal as Affleck's replacement for Batman
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare:
Apparently Matt Reeves is eyeing Jake Gyllenhaal as Affleck's replacement for Batman

Too bad Ledger's dead. We could have Brokebat Mountain. :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare:
Apparently Matt Reeves is eyeing Jake Gyllenhaal as Affleck's replacement for Batman

Isn't that if Ben leaves?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Frazod:
Too bad Ledger's dead. We could have Brokebat Mountain. :-)

It would be a family affair too since Maggie was in Dark Knight as Rachel.
[Reply]

Ouch, terrible Rotten Tomato score. They couldn't even manage to get a 70?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz:
Sounds like this movie should've been longer too.

I think WB probably over course corrected based on BvS length and the complaints about its slow pace. They wanted a film that was faster paced and under 2 hours.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990:
I think WB probably over course corrected based on BvS length and the complaints about its slow pace. They wanted a film that was faster paced and under 2 hours.

Definitely...

A buddy of mine saw this tonight and said it was fun and enjoyed it. Not epic by any means but enjoyed the league and said it could've used more time for the plot.he gave it a 7/10 and said it gave him some hope for future movies
[Reply]

welp, i understand that its no Thor.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by cabletech94:
welp, i understand that its no Thor.

Marvel is really crushing it lately with their movies.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz:
Definitely...

A buddy of mine saw this tonight and said it was fun and enjoyed it. Not epic by any means but enjoyed the league and said it could've used more time for the plot.he gave it a 7/10 and said it gave him some hope for future movies

I saw it last night and this is exactly my thoughts. I think they were hurt by not having individual movies for each character. Cyborg comes off really flat because of this. Aquaman and Flash overcome some of it due to their emotions, but cyborg, well that's not part of the character.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz:
Marvel is really crushing it lately with their movies.

They just have an incredible system setup. They know exactly what they are doing. It's amazing. Even their weaker movies are still pretty good.
[Reply]

Movie is meh. I will give it a 6/10. I will probably forget most of the memorable stuff by next week. They just have no idea how to do good comic book movies.
[Reply]