ChiefsPlanet Mobile
View Poll Results: Do you approve or disapprove of The Trade? Why?
I approve of the trade and am thrilled about Patrick Mahomes. 284 81.61%
I approve of the trade, even through I would’ve preferred Deshaun Watson over Patrick Mahomes. 29 8.33%
I approve of the trade, even through I would’ve preferred Deshone Kizer over Patrick Mahomes. 0 0%
I approve of the trade, even through I would’ve preferred a QB other than Watson/Kizer over Patrick Mahomes. 1 0.29%
I approve of the trade, even through I would’ve preferred a non-QB over Patrick Mahomes. 1 0.29%
I disapprove of the trade because it was too much to pay even though I like Mahomes. 6 1.72%
I disapprove of the trade because I don’t think Mahomes is that good. 1 0.29%
I disapprove of the trade because I think we could get more value out of the three picks we gave up. 3 0.86%
I disapprove of the trade because we have greater needs than quarterback. 2 0.57%
I disapprove of the trade because I think Mahomes would have been available at 27. 4 1.15%
I have no idea what to think. 4 1.15%
I’m not going to vote because in the future I will change my opinion to make myself look smart. 2 0.57%
I'm still fixated that we drafted Blackledge over Marino. 11 3.16%
Voters: 348. You may not vote on this poll
Page 8 of 16
« First < 45678 9101112 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>Approval/Disapproval of The Trade.
Rain Man 08:06 PM 04-27-2017
If you don't know what The Trade is, just go away.

What do you think? This is a public poll, because we're going to come back in five years and revisit this day.
[Reply]
Mr. Laz 10:06 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by BossChief:
WE FUCKING STOLE A FRANCHISE QB.
NEVER SAID I DIDN'T WANT ONE
[Reply]
DaneMcCloud 10:07 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut:
Now, while you criticize the few of us.. Ask yourselves... When has a franchise ever successfully traded away that much in picks receiving both good value AND an elite QB.
Ask yourself: When have you ever made a relevant comment on CP?
[Reply]
O.city 10:07 PM 04-27-2017
They basically gave up 10 spots in the 3rd and next year's first
[Reply]
notorious 10:07 PM 04-27-2017
Dane is back!
[Reply]
kccrow 10:08 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz:
NEVER SAID I DIDN'T WANT ONE
This is true and I back Laz on this. He's been on board with this. I hammer the guy for a ton of shit, but this isn't one of those things.
[Reply]
TigeRRUppeRRcut 10:08 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz:
If we win the super bowl and pick 32.

if not the value gets worse with each slot our pick goes higher.

I'm ok with selecting Mahomes, I really am.

Value wasn't good though. At the very least, we shouldn't have had to give up that extra 3rd round pick this year.

Whatever, nobody wants to hear it.

Enjoy the QB selection.
And the thing is, no one in their right mind can logically argue with this without a crystal ball
[Reply]
Mr. Laz 10:08 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Hey look it's Laz to bitch about something.


You really do bitch just to bitch. You must be unbearable in real life dude
Says the cum-guzzling fugtard who has been complaining about Alex Smith every day for the last 2 years.
[Reply]
Rain Man 10:09 PM 04-27-2017
I've always had the perception that teams tend to value a next-year pick as being one round less than the same this-year pick.

That would put the value at:

2017 #10 pick - 1,300 points

versus

2017 #27 pick - 680 points
2017 #91 pick - 136 points
2018 1st round pick - 484 points is the equivalent of the 10th pick in the second round, so a one-round discount means it's a 10th pick in the first round.

So overall, it seems like a fair trade or even a good trade if you believe that rule of thumb. I personally think that the draft chart overvalues top-ten picks too much.

I hope Mahomes blows this trade out of the water. I just don't think I would have made the trade.
[Reply]
Hammock Parties 10:09 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
Ask yourself: When have you ever made a relevant comment on CP?

[Reply]
Mr. Laz 10:10 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by kccrow:
This is true and I back Laz on this. He's been on board with this. I hammer the guy for a ton of shit, but this isn't one of those things.
I said before the pick that i was ok with selecting one.

I was going to trust Dorsey and Reid on this one.


I merely commented on the value, that's all.
[Reply]
DaneMcCloud 10:10 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut:
And the thing is, no one in their right mind can logically argue with this without a crystal ball
The entire draft is a crap shoot.

Teams do their best to vet players (some, better than others) but no team hits 100%.

The Chiefs have been a very good drafting team since 2013.

They deserve the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
[Reply]
GloucesterChief 10:10 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut:
Now, while you criticize the few of us.. Ask yourselves... When has a franchise ever successfully traded away that much in picks receiving both good value AND an elite QB.
It isn't like we went Skins-RGIII or Saints-Ricky Williams style trade or even the Rams last year for Goff.
[Reply]
New World Order 10:10 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by ASS11:
Look at those assholes waving their stupid towels
[Reply]
TigeRRUppeRRcut 10:11 PM 04-27-2017
And his hands are barely larger than kaepernicks. Haven't watched all his film but how does he play in cold/wet conditions??
[Reply]
RunKC 10:11 PM 04-27-2017
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz:
Says the cum-guzzling fugtard who has been complaining about Alex Smith every day for the last 2 years.
And for good fucking reason! Glad the Chiefs traded up!

Of course if the Chiefs win the SB one day, you'all bitch about how they won it, bc well that's just you Laz.
[Reply]
Page 8 of 16
« First < 45678 9101112 > Last »
Up