Originally Posted by RobertWeathers:
Ok let's test that.
So if a woman accuses Mahomes of raping her, but never goes to the cops to press charges but files a civil suit instead seeking $ you think the Chiefs should suspend him?
If the woman had text messages from the accused that may corroborate her story, passed a polygraph and there were multiple people who knew of the incident right after the fact then no, he shouldn't play [Reply]
Originally Posted by RobertWeathers:
The Chiefs suspended Hill because social services was investigating a potential abuse case. They were already reeling from Hunt's issue and decided it was a good PR measure.
Again...an accusation.
Or, it was the right thing to do for Tyreek and his family to get those issues sorted out.
But again, the Chiefs are a classy organization...unlike the Rapetriots. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BryanBusby:
Polygraph tests that the victim passed and the messages from AB that said "fuk u btch I cm n ur bck lmao" are pretty damning. Start combining this other trainer "is money hungry" this chef "is money hungry" the people he threw furniture at "are money hungry"
When are you going to stop being an enabler because he can catch a football real good? Rape lover.
P-graph results are inadmissible in a court of law.
At this point it's a he said/she said.
If the DA of Pitt or MIA indicted AB I'd have a different PoV. [Reply]
Originally Posted by New World Order:
If the woman had text messages from the accused that may corroborate her story, passed a polygraph and there were multiple people who knew of the incident right after the fact then no, he shouldn't play
That is circumstantial evidence and not vetted by pre-trial motions, discovery and the defendant's right to due process.
Suspending Mahomes for speculation and he said/she said is not the right thing to do. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RobertWeathers:
Enlighten me.
Feel free to google it yourself while you're searching up your rape Defense, as it'll let you know that a polygraph admittance is up to the judge presiding the case.
He also can be punished without even being Guilty. If he can't produce evidence to support himself beyond she's a money hungry whore, he's fucked. Ask Ezekiel Elliot. They do not have to wait for a verdict in any case to do whatever they please, and he hasn't shown any real compelling evidence that would really make me think he's not a rape man. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RobertWeathers:
That is circumstantial evidence and not vetted by pre-trial motions, discovery and the defendant's right to due process.
Suspending Mahomes for speculation and he said/she said is not the right thing to do.
