TribalElder 03:29 PM 10-26-2020
Chicago Bears (5-1)
at
Los Angeles Rams (4-2)
7:15 pm central
ESPN
[Reply]
pugsnotdrugs19 03:41 PM 10-26-2020
The #1 seed Bears currently, somehow
[Reply]
lcarus 03:43 PM 10-26-2020
alpha_omega 03:44 PM 10-26-2020
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 :
The #1 seed Bears currently, somehow
Shocking.
[Reply]
Pablo 03:45 PM 10-26-2020
The Bears need to win this one so their eventual slide into a 500 team is even more hilarious.
[Reply]
mr. tegu 04:00 PM 10-26-2020
Both teams that aren’t as good as their records indicate. But who is further away from their record? Probably the Bears.
[Reply]
CarlosCarson27 04:03 PM 10-26-2020
Word on the street is Bears 27-24.
But if that's wrong, I'll know what street to move from
[Reply]
Chargem 04:06 PM 10-26-2020
Originally Posted by mr. tegu :
Both teams that aren’t as good as their records indicate. But who is further away from their record? Probably the Bears.
But, the Rams 4 wins are literally all against the garbage NFC East.
[Reply]
mr. tegu 04:17 PM 10-26-2020
Originally Posted by Chargem :
But, the Rams 4 wins are literally all against the garbage NFC East.
True, but the Rams at least have a track record of offensive competence, though I don’t think their defense is quite as good.
[Reply]
BlackOp 04:19 PM 10-26-2020
I think this has the potential to be a good game...
[Reply]
TribalElder 04:27 PM 10-26-2020
Originally Posted by BlackOp :
I think this has the potential to be a good game...
hope so, late game last night was a pleasant surprise
[Reply]
CarlosCarson27 04:42 PM 10-26-2020
Originally Posted by TribalElder :
hope so, late game last night was a pleasant surprise
Lol at using the proper "pleasant"
For a football game!!
Oh look Agatha, its football. Is the tea ready? This should be pleasant..
:-)
Oh look, they scored, what a pleasant surprise.
Jk
[Reply]
KCUnited 04:46 PM 10-26-2020
Bears have 126 yards on the ground...in their last 3 games combined
[Reply]
Rain Man 04:58 PM 10-26-2020
Remember when the Rams were supposedly a powerhouse with Goff, Gurley, Peters, Talib, and Suh?
[Reply]