:-)
[Reply]

Ummm, no
[Reply]

Yes.

If we win 5 we clinch.

If we win 4 and they lose 1 we clinch.

Etc etc
[Reply]

If we win 0 and the Pats lose 5, the Chargers are laughing there way to the 1-seed.

Clinch having a better record than the Pats? Sure. But the thread title is talking about the 1-seed
[Reply]

:-)

k bud

this thread is for realistic scenarios
[Reply]

What you said is inaccurate. You're only accounting for the Pats and Chiefs.

Chargers win out and the amount of losses by the Pats means absolutely nothing.
[Reply]

This is correct if both the Chiefs and Chargers end up at 14-2 (assuming the Chiefs lose the second game with the Chargers) it goes to the third tie-breaker which is record among common opponents which would be 12-1 Chiefs and 12-2 Chargers (the Rams game being the deciding match).
[Reply]

Thank you yes forgot they would have lost to a common opponent we did not.
[Reply]

Yep.

Almost impossible for the Chargers to leapfrog us.
[Reply]

Why is this ass clown allowed to post?
[Reply]

Pats just slowed down.

Chiefs need to keep the accelerator to the floor . . . . .
[Reply]

Chargers are now a bigger risk than the Pats. Can't lose to the Rams and then to the Chargers. Get through those 2 and we're golden.
[Reply]

BUT IF THE PATS LOSE WE CLINCH!!!!
[Reply]

We absolutely will not lose to the Chargers
[Reply]