Chiefs *****2024 NFL DRAFT THREAD - NO SPOILERS***** - Page 161

Version 2024 - PATRICK MAHOMES & THE HUNT FOR THE THREEPEAT

Let's ****ing do this.

Originally Posted by :
Rules for once the draft begins:
No spoiled picks in this thread, all weekend. This means that as tweets are leaking picks a few minutes before the selection is announced live, you don't post it in this thread (ex: embedded tweets), reference it in this thread (ex: Joe Slapdick says it's So and So to Green Bay) or hint at it (ex: "it's a RB!").

Don't be a dick.

Otherwise, have fun, talk shit, freak out and lose your goddamned minds. It's Draft Weekend. The hot takes in these threads are so funny. I'll also be starting player threads for each of our picks as they are made, with videos and notable stats/takes in the OP. These separate threads will be made as soon as the news breaks, outside of this thread. I will link the threads below. Pure knee-jerk gold to reference in the future.

Here are our picks:

Round 1, #28: Xavier Worthy
Round 2, #63: Kingsley Suamataia
Round 4, #131: Jared Wiley
Round 4, #133: Jaden Hicks
Round 5, #159: Hunter Nourzad
Round 6, #211: Kamal Hadden
Round 7, #248: C.J. Hanson

Here is a list of the prospects the Chiefs have shown interest in this year.

View the 2023 Draft thread here
View the 2022 Draft thread here
View the 2021 Draft thread here
View the 2020 Draft thread here
View the 2019 Draft thread here
View the 2018 Draft thread here
View the 2017 Draft thread here

[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
I'm certainly not advocating for the Penix pick, but I think the age thing matters a lot less for the QB position than almost any other. A QB can play well into their mid thirties if not to 40. I still think it's a dumb pick, just not for age concerns.

I also wouldn't care about a RB's age, because I probably won't pay their second contract anyway.

Carry on.

I just think it makes it all the more odd, not necessarily worse.
[Reply]

Buffalo would have to give up the farm to get Cinci to deal Higgins inside the conference.

And a trade is stupid anyway - they had access to multiple WR's at their picks, traded down twice and STILL have WR talent available to them.

Why use draft capital AND have to pay a monster contract when you're already in cap hell?

Maybe they hate all the WR prospects?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
Picking Penix (I don’t like the pick personally) wouldn’t be thought of as an all time dumb decision.

Signing Counsins isn’t a dumb decision.

It’s the two moves TOGETHER that are dumb. You have an aging, expensive QB with a prime draft pick. That’s the time to take a player to build around that expensive QB you just signed.

If you want Penix, you always knew he’d be there. Don’t sign Cousins. Just pick Penix and use the cap space to build around him.

I've paid no attention to the Cousins contract, but my initial reaction was that they signed Cousins to train the new guy for a year. Or did they give Cousins a Russell Wilson-type contract?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Rain Man:
I've paid no attention to the Cousins contract, but my initial reaction was that they signed Cousins to train the new guy for a year. Or did they give Cousins a Russell Wilson-type contract?

I think they are stuck with Cousins for at least two years, the out in the contract doesn't come until year 3.
[Reply]

Cousins basically has a 2 year deal but it has a no trade clause.
[Reply]