... the word in the Chiefs building is that they would like to trade up for QB Patrick Mahomes or RB Christian McCaffrey in the first round. If this falls through, he said they like ILB Zach Cunningham a lot as well. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sully:
It's Hawk Tackling. I haven't checked, but would be willing to bet the majority of the team tackles similarly. Get used to it... everyone will be tackling similarly within 10 years. I just started teaching it this year.
Originally Posted by Sully:
It's Hawk Tackling. I haven't checked, but would be willing to bet the majority of the team tackles similarly. Get used to it... everyone will be tackling similarly within 10 years. I just started teaching it this year.
Seahawks taking credit for this technique is laughable. Elite rugby has been doing this forever.
Higher-level competition like college/pro can succeed with this, but it is tough to teach for high school or minor football. I don't like the tracking techniques. The progressions USA Football, Football Canada and the originator FootballUniversity (Thurmond Moore) teach and implement are much better in my opinion with regards to building fundamentals and sound technique.
Like anything you commit to for a program, you have to marry it. If one starts trying to combine different aspects of multiple approach s it becomes problematic with terminology and consistency. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Nickhead:
i can't stand alex, but it makes sense not to reach for a qb in round one.
if anything i would try and trade for teddy b. it gives him another year to recover, no huge cash involved, and minimal draft hit due to the injury. but what do i know :-)
Well if we're going the retread route, give me Garappolo or even AJ McCarron. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut:
The only exception I would make to trading up for Offense is giving up a third to get Corey Davis. He seems perfect for a WCO
That's the smartest thing I've seen you post. Corey Davis is this year's Amari Cooper. Love this kid. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sully:
It's Hawk Tackling. I haven't checked, but would be willing to bet the majority of the team tackles similarly. Get used to it... everyone will be tackling similarly within 10 years. I just started teaching it this year.
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2:
Thanks; good information.
He's a slightly more extreme version of that in that he often omits the shoulder to the chest part (which seems to be foundational for 'hawk tackling' and honestly it's similar to the 'head across the body' technique I was taught almost 20 years ago).
But that's the first time I've seen the leg whip/roll taught as an actual technique rather than the hip thrust and drive.
Like I said, Cunningham uses that to outstanding effect - he's not a tentative tackler. He's just something you have to get used to. He's going to be a very good player, IMO. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Thanks; good information.
He's a slightly more extreme version of that in that he often omits the shoulder to the chest part (which seems to be foundational for 'hawk tackling' and honestly it's similar to the 'head across the body' technique I was taught almost 20 years ago).
But that's the first time I've seen the leg whip/roll taught as an actual technique rather than the hip thrust and drive.
Like I said, Cunningham uses that to outstanding effect - he's not a tentative tackler. He's just something you have to get used to. He's going to be a very good player, IMO.
Would you be happy with Cunningham at 27 (assuming top QB's are gone)?
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Would you be happy with Cunningham at 27 (assuming top QB's are gone)?
I'm coming around to it.
As everything, it depends on the board.
Before I really got involved in the draft season, he was my favorite likely target after Mahomes. I really like the player.
I've seen some other guys since then that I'd have to go back and review again as a direct comparison (Wormley was brought up in the draft forum and he's among them). But I have a hard time saying that I'd be upset by that pick regardless of what non-QB options are available.
I may decide that I like Wormley better or Barnett or Ross, but if those guys are available and the Chiefs go Cunningham, I'd be fine with that as well. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Thanks; good information.
He's a slightly more extreme version of that in that he often omits the shoulder to the chest part (which seems to be foundational for 'hawk tackling' and honestly it's similar to the 'head across the body' technique I was taught almost 20 years ago).
But that's the first time I've seen the leg whip/roll taught as an actual technique rather than the hip thrust and drive.
Like I said, Cunningham uses that to outstanding effect - he's not a tentative tackler. He's just something you have to get used to. He's going to be a very good player, IMO.
He isn't great at it, but he has obviously taken to heart the near shoulder part of it, as everything I saw in the small amount I watched was hit with a near shoulder. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Dorsey has never drafted for immediate need in the first round. I can't see him starting now.
The underrated guy to watch for at 27 if the QB's are gone? Buddha Baker.
Long-term Parker replacement?
Love the athleticism but I worry that his size will have him giving some of it back. He'll miss balls that a 6'1'' player gets a hand on.
People forget all those times that Brandon Flowers had perfect position on somebody and the player just went over him and took the ball away. It's not a deal-breaker, but it's a bit worrisome nonetheless.
In the end, I can't see a scenario where he'd be my preferred guy on the board. As for 'immediate need' - Dorsey's also done a very good job of ensuring that he hasn't gone into the draft with any pressing immediate needs. That's not the case with this year's roster - inside linebacker absolutely HAS to be addressed and now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chief Northman:
Seahawks taking credit for this technique is laughable. Elite rugby has been doing this forever.
Higher-level competition like college/pro can succeed with this, but it is tough to teach for high school or minor football. I don't like the tracking techniques. The progressions USA Football, Football Canada and the originator FootballUniversity (Thurmond Moore) teach and implement are much better in my opinion with regards to building fundamentals and sound technique.
Like anything you commit to for a program, you have to marry it. If one starts trying to combine different aspects of multiple approach s it becomes problematic with terminology and consistency.
The tracking is what made me finally buy into it. I like how it fits perfectly into teaching inside-out, eliminates cutbacks if done correctly, and leads to better angles for gang-tackling. It took me about a year to wrap my head around it, because it is essentially the opposite of the head across that I was taught and coached for years. But I am a fan, now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sully:
The tracking is what made me finally buy into it. I like how it fits perfectly into teaching inside-out, eliminates cutbacks if done correctly, and leads to better angles for gang-tackling. It took me about a year to wrap my head around it, because it is essentially the opposite of the head across that I was taught and coached for years. But I am a fan, now.
Ah...I see the distinction now. I had missed the 'near shoulder' element. Yeah, I can see that.
Funny how a basically mundane thing can have so many evolutions going forward. "Tacklin' is tacklin' man....get 'em to ground". Nope. That's where some of you folks have me whuped. I can talk baseball with anybody but there are a handful of folks in here w/r/t football that are right outside of my knowledge base.
