We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.
If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Maybe...but Houston was a great run defender. Sutton wasted him by dropping into coverage. I think Indy runs a 4-3...and signed him.
Anyway...it might have been a better situation as it would have allowed them to see what they have in Speaks/K-pass....without giving up picks and a mammoth contract.
Didn't Houston rate out higher than Clark last season? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Anyway...it might have been a better situation as it would have allowed them to see what they have in Speaks/K-pass....without giving up picks and a mammoth contract.
Didn't Houston rate out higher than Clark last season?
Originally Posted by O.city:
The Chiefs don't owe him that, it's the dead money on the deal. They aren't paying it out anymore.
Signing bonuses are spread out over the life of the deal.
Regardless...he would have made $21 million this year. He is still costing $7 million. He freed up $14 million...which the Chiefs might use on a $19 million per player that cost them picks.
That's a loss of $5 million and picks...is Clark that much better? [Reply]
Something I hadn’t considered: The #Chiefs have a TON of cap room right now. Maybe they could front-load Frank Clark’s deal the way the 49ers did with Dee Ford?
Something I hadn’t considered: The #Chiefs have a TON of cap room right now. Maybe they could front-load Frank Clark’s deal the way the 49ers did with Dee Ford?
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Regardless...he would have made $21 million this year. He is still costing $7 million. He freed up $14 million...which the Chiefs might use on a $19 million per player that cost them picks.
That's a loss of $5 million and picks...is Clark that much better?
5 years younger with no injury history. More productive in pass rush. [Reply]