Originally Posted by RobertWeathers:
Elliott, Hunt and Hill were all railroaded one way or the other.
This is a prime example of why the league needs to stay out of all of it unless there at least charges filed. Way too much variability and its really tough to determine one thing from another what warrants action when you don't have a reliable standard such as charges being filed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
With Hunt, Hill, and Elliot there was a criminal complaint and investigation which there has not been in this case.
The criminal investigation part of the Hunt situation was resolved well before the season started. He was put on the exempt list in November because of a video and nothing more. [Reply]
We all know the Pats were colluding with Brown to get him anyway.
Anyone who says otherwise is just naive. Rosenhous knew exactly what he was doing.
So fuck the Patriots. They are held to a different, lesser standard than everyone else. It will be that way till Brady retires. It is what it is. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Amnorix:
I will say it again -- the week before a Chiefs Super Bowl, some woman files civil claims against Tyreek with all kinds of horrible allegations. You agree with him being suspended for that game without any NFL investigation into the matter. That's your position?
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
This is a prime example of why the league needs to stay out of all of it unless there at least charges filed. Way too much variability and its really tough to determine one thing from another what warrants action when you don't have a reliable standard such as charges being filed.
Originally Posted by CapsLockKey:
The criminal investigation part of the Hunt situation was resolved well before the season started. He was put on the exempt list in November because of a video and nothing more.
We can argue the CLE police didn't do their due-diligence but based on the video, what he did wasn't as bad as it seemed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RobertWeathers:
We can argue the CLE police didn't do their due-diligence but based on the video, what he did wasn't as bad as it seemed.
Well, he shouldn't have fucking lied, because if he hadn't we would have had him coming back at week 8 with fresh legs for a 4 headed monster at RB come playoff time. [Reply]
Originally Posted by rabblerouser:
Well, he shouldn't have ****ing lied, because if he hadn't we would have had him coming back at week 8 with fresh legs for a 4 headed monster at RB come playoff time.
Doubt we have the rbs we do if Hunt were still on the team. Doubtful shady is signed, and who knows if we bother drafting D train. [Reply]
Originally Posted by CapsLockKey:
The criminal investigation part of the Hunt situation was resolved well before the season started. He was put on the exempt list in November because of a video and nothing more.
Well yea but there was a criminal investigation and a video of him in a physical confrontation with a woman.
Not saying its right but there are distinct differences. [Reply]
A strawman is when I suggest you are arguing something you are not. I'm not arguing anything -- I'm asking a question. One you clearly don't want to answer, for obvious reasons. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Amnorix:
errr....no. I'm reporting what I read from reporters who are covering the NFL.
I will say it again -- the week before a Chiefs Super Bowl, some woman files civil claims against Tyreek with all kinds of horrible allegations. You agree with him being suspended for that game without any NFL investigation into the matter. That's your position?
So you're saying the Dolphins game is your Superbowl this year?
