Ugly..
[Reply]

They're going all in on SUVs, so I guess if they wanted the Mustang brand to live on, this is what it had to be. Does seem weird though.
[Reply]

Sullies the reputation of great Mustangs like the II.

https://www.motor1.com/news/135176/w...-ford-mustang/
[Reply]

That's not a Mustang.
[Reply]

Doesn't even resemble a mustang in any way.

It looks like it got high center damage too.
[Reply]

I like it. But I think a hybrid would be more useful.
[Reply]

Looks like one one of those smaller SUVs designed to appeal to women.
[Reply]

The GT will have 460 hp
[Reply]

Need some better views to really get a gauge on how I feel about a Mustang SUV
[Reply]

I think it looks pretty nice. However the base model is 5k too expensive, with roughly 230 miles of range. Eligible for the credit, but I dont think this will be a better vehicle than a Tesla Model Y, considering that base has a higher range (300) and better charging network for 48k.
[Reply]

Good looking non-Mustang.
[Reply]

Super cool.
[Reply]

I wonder if it slides into the ditch with the slightest amount of snowfall like other Mustangs?
[Reply]

Don't like how it looks in that picture at all
[Reply]