2017 1 0.69%

2016 1 0.69%

2015 1 0.69%

2014 1 0.69%

2013 3 2.07%

2012 7 4.83%

2011 6 4.14%

2010 4 2.76%

2009 1 0.69%

2008 1 0.69%

2007 5 3.45%

2006 11 7.59%

2005 23 15.86%

2004 8 5.52%

2003 9 6.21%

2002 13 8.97%

2001 12 8.28%

2000 35 24.14%

None - you all are literally retarts! 10 6.90%

All of them - everyone is beautiful in their own special way!! 6 4.14%

2018 already has 34? Wtf?
[Reply]

It's the place to be man
[Reply]

2005 MOTHERFUCKERS
[Reply]

And I finally got an internet connection.
[Reply]

Not to beat a dead horse or anything, but look at the impact of turning on new user moderation in 2015-2016. :-)
[Reply]

mults
[Reply]

This was just intended to be a dumb, fun thread for TGIF - as it turns out it was quite interesting.
[Reply]

Jesus Christ. Those old mods really almost killed this place. Good stuff, Face
[Reply]

You're a treasonous ass.
[Reply]

WTF happened in 2015?

I think that was the year BRC told me to run n00b of the year. Boy, I got fucked on that deal
[Reply]

2016
[Reply]

I think that's what Daface is referencing. That's when they turned on the new user registration where a mod had to check new accounts and sign off it wasn't a multiple before the account could post. It took time and a lot of ppl would just never check back. If memory serves
[Reply]

DadLeft4Cigarettes wanted me to pass on this message - (I keep up with him on FB some)

To the Mom thot barned me! If you'd evern in Bates City I wil fine you and beet your ass to pull!! I will be one or two place eider cigarette city outley or truck stop in higginville. I wore trucker had that say eat me on them. yellow an red just like cheif

come fine me fools
[Reply]

Yep. Correlation is not causation and all that, but it seems pretty obvious that systematically delaying gratification for new users would cause many to just lose interest.
[Reply]

Wow. I wonder why he got banned.
[Reply]